...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >In and out: Effects of shoot- vs. rooted-presence sampling methods on plant diversity measures in mountain grasslands
【24h】

In and out: Effects of shoot- vs. rooted-presence sampling methods on plant diversity measures in mountain grasslands

机译:内外:地上存在与根存在采样方法对山区草地植物多样性措施的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Plant diversity measures (e.g., alpha- and beta-diversity) provide the basis for a number of ecological indication and monitoring methods. These measures are based on species counts in sampling units (plots or quadrats). However, there are two alternative conventions for defining a vascular plant species as "present" in a plot, i.e. "shoot presence" (a species is recorded if the vertical projection of any above-ground part falls within the plot) and "rooted presence" (a species is recorded only when an individual is rooted inside the plot). Very few studies addressed the effects of the two sampling conventions on species richness and diversity indices. We sampled mountain dry grasslands in Italy across different plot sizes and vegetation types to assess how large is the difference in alpha- and beta-diversity values and in sample based rarefaction curves between the two methods. We found that the difference is greatly dependent on plot size, being more relevant, both in absolute and percentage values, at smaller grain; it is also dependent on habitat type, being larger in shallow-soil communities, as they have a sparser vegetation structure and host life-form types with a larger lateral spread. At fine spatial scales (<1 m(2)) the difference is large enough to bias statistical inference, and we conclude that at such scales one should not attempt to compare plant diversity indices if they were not obtained with the same sampling convention. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:植物多样性措施(例如α和β多样性)为许多生态指示和监测方法提供了基础。这些度量基于采样单位(图或方图)中的物种计数。但是,有两种可选的约定将维管植物物种定义为地块中的“存在”,即“拍摄存在”(如果任何地上部分的垂直投影落在该地块内,则记录该物种)和“根存在” ”(仅当某个人扎根在该地块内时才记录该物种)。很少有研究讨论这两种采样约定对物种丰富度和多样性指数的影响。我们在意大利的山区旱地草原上对不同样地大小和植被类型进行了抽样,以评估α-和β-多样性值的差异以及这两种方法之间基于样本的稀疏曲线的差异有多大。我们发现,差异在很大程度上取决于地块的大小,在较小的谷物上,绝对值和百分比值的相关性更大。它也取决于栖息地的类型,在浅土社区中更大,因为它们的植被结构较稀疏,并且具有生命形态类型,横向分布较大。在精细的空间尺度(<1 m(2))上,差异足够大,足以使统计推断产生偏差,并且我们得出的结论是,在这样的尺度下,如果植物多样性指数不是通过相同的采样惯例获得的,则不应尝试比较植物多样性指数。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号