...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Eco-efficiency Of Intensification Scenarios For Milk Production In New Zealand
【24h】

Eco-efficiency Of Intensification Scenarios For Milk Production In New Zealand

机译:新西兰奶类生产集约化方案的生态效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

New Zealand (NZ) dairy farms used to be the lowest input and most efficient dairy farms of the world. However, intensification of the traditional pasture-based system has occurred over the last decade and has not always been accompanied by increased efficiency. The purpose of this paper is to produce an updated reference of the eco-efficiency of NZ dairy farm systems and to analyse the implications of intensification on their eco-efficiency. Results for an average NZ dairy farm system were compared with those for three dairy farmlet systems representing a wide range in intensification practices. A low input system (LI) (no N fertiliser, no brought-in feed supplement, stocking rate of 2.3 cows/ha) was compared with an N-fertilised farm system (NF) (170 kg fertiliser-N/ha/year, 3 cows/ha) representing a first level of intensification and with an N-fertilised and maize silage supplemented system (NFMS) (170 kg fertiliser-N/ha/year, 131 DM maize silage/ha/year, 5.2 cows/ha), representing a possible future intensification option. Their eco-efficiency in terms of milk production and land use was compared using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. NZ dairy farm systems rely on favourable temperate climate conditions and long-term perennial ryegrass/white clover pasture, to achieve eco-efficient milk production and land use compared to European systems. However, intensification of NZ dairy farms was shown to be detrimental to their eco-efficiency in terms both of milk production and land use functions and could greatly reduce their advantage compared to European systems. The eco-efficiency of LI was very high whatever the functional unit which is remarkable from an LCA perspective. NF and NFMS had a similar eco-efficiency except for energy use which corresponded to the most critical hot spot of NFMS. All studied NZ systems presented some areas for improvement where some new technologies available for dairy farms might play a promising role in the future. Finally, it should be highlighted that the comparison with European studies based on the literature available needs validation through a more comprehensive study using harmonised methodology and assumptions across countries.
机译:新西兰(NZ)奶牛场曾经是世界上投入最少,效率最高的奶牛场。然而,在过去的十年中,传统的基于牧场的系统的集约化已经发生,并且并不总是伴随着效率的提高。本文的目的是提供有关新西兰奶牛场系统生态效率的最新参考,并分析集约化对其生态效率的影响。将新西兰平均奶牛场系统的结果与代表集约化实践的三种奶牛场系统的结果进行了比较。将低输入系统(LI)(无氮肥,无外来饲料补充,2.3头牛/公顷的放养率)与氮肥养殖系统(NF)(170千克氮肥/公顷/年, 3头母牛/公顷),代表第一阶段的集约化水平,并具有氮肥和玉米青贮饲料补充系统(NFMS)(170千克肥料/ N /公顷/年,131 DM玉米青贮/公顷/年,5.2头母牛/公顷) ,代表将来可能会采取的强化措施。使用生命周期评估(LCA)方法比较了他们在牛奶生产和土地使用方面的生态效率。新西兰的奶牛场系统依靠有利的温带气候条件和长期的多年生黑麦草/白三叶草牧场,与欧洲系统相比,能够实现生态高效的牛奶生产和土地利用。但是,事实证明,新西兰集约化奶牛场的集约化在牛奶生产和土地利用功能方面均不利于其生态效率,与欧洲体系相比,集约化奶牛场的优势可能大大降低。无论从LCA角度来看,功能单元如何,LI的生态效率都很高。 NF和NFMS具有相似的生态效率,但能源使用量与NFMS的最关键热点相对应。所有研究过的新西兰系统都提出了一些需要改进的领域,其中一些奶牛场可用的新技术可能会在未来发挥重要作用。最后,应该强调的是,基于现有文献与欧洲研究的比较需要通过使用各国间统一方法和假设的更全面研究来验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号