...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Performance Characteristics of the Abbott BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test in Comparison to Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR and Viral Culture in Community Testing Sites during November 2020
【24h】

Performance Characteristics of the Abbott BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test in Comparison to Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR and Viral Culture in Community Testing Sites during November 2020

机译:Abbott Binaxnow SARS-COV-2抗原试验的性能特征与2020年11月的实时逆转录酶PCR和病毒培养相比

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ABSTRACT Point-of-care antigen tests are an important tool for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Antigen tests are less sensitive than real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR). Data on the performance of the BinaxNOW antigen test compared to rRT-PCR and viral culture by symptom and known exposure status, timing during disease, or exposure period and demographic variables are limited. During 3 to 17 November 2020, we collected paired upper respiratory swab specimens to test for SARS-CoV-2 by rRT-PCR and Abbott BinaxNOW antigen test at two community testing sites in Pima County, Arizona. We administered a questionnaire to capture symptoms, known exposure status, and previous SARS-CoV-2 test results. Specimens positive by either test were analyzed by viral culture. Previously we showed overall BinaxNOW sensitivity was 52.5%. Here, we showed BinaxNOW sensitivity increased to 65.7% among currently symptomatic individuals reporting a known exposure. BinaxNOW sensitivity was lower among participants with a known exposure and previously symptomatic (32.4%) or never symptomatic (47.1%) within 14?days of testing. Sensitivity was 71.1% in participants within a week of symptom onset. In participants with a known exposure, sensitivity was highest 8 to 10?days postexposure (75%). The positive predictive value for recovery of virus in cell culture was 56.7% for BinaxNOW-positive and 35.4% for rRT-PCR-positive specimens. Result reporting time was 2.5?h for BinaxNOW and 26?h for rRT-PCR. Point-of-care antigen tests have a shorter turnaround time than laboratory-based nucleic acid amplification tests, which allows for more rapid identification of infected individuals. Antigen test sensitivity limitations are important to consider when developing a testing program.
机译:摘要护理点抗原试验是SARS-COV-2检测的重要工具。抗原试验比实时逆转录酶PCR(RRT-PCR)敏感。通过症状和已知的暴露状态,疾病期间的时序或接触期间和人口变量,与RRT-PCR和病毒培养相比,对Binaxnow抗原测试的性能进行了数据。在2020年11月3日至17日,我们收集了配对的上呼吸拭子标本,在亚利桑那皮玛县的两个社区测试地点进行RRT-PCR和Abbott Binaxnow抗原试验测试SARS-COV-2。我们管理调查问卷以捕获症状,已知的曝光状态和以前的SARS-COV-2测试结果。通过病毒培养分析了通过测试阳性的标本。以前,我们表明整体Binaxnow敏感性为52.5%。在这里,我们在目前有症状的人报告称为已知的暴露的目前症状中,Binaxnow敏感度增加到65.7%。参与者的参与者的敏感性较低,并且在14天内,参与者的参与者和以前有症状(32.4%)或从未有症状(47.1%)。在症状发作的一周内参与者的敏感性为71.1%。在已知曝光的参与者中,敏感度最高8到10?天后曝光(75%)。对细胞培养物中病毒恢复的阳性预测值为BinaxNow阳性的56.7%,35.4%用于RRT-PCR阳性标本。结果报告时间为2.5?H对于rRT-PCR的BinaxNow和26?H.护理点抗原试验具有比实验室的核酸扩增试验更短的周转时间,这允许更快速地鉴定受感染的个体。抗原测试敏感性限制对于开发测试程序时非常重要。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号