...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Diversify the syllabi: Underrepresentation of female authors in college course readings
【24h】

Diversify the syllabi: Underrepresentation of female authors in college course readings

机译:大学学院历程中的女性作者的代表性多样化

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Emerging evidence demonstrates that female-authored publications are not well represented in course readings in some fields, resulting in a syllabi gender gap. Lack of representation may decrease student awareness of opportunities in professional fields and disadvantage the career success of female academics. We contribute to the evidence on the syllabi gender gap by: 1) quantifying the extent to which female authors are represented in assigned course readings; 2) examining representation of female authors by gender of instructor and discipline; and 3) comparing female representation in syllabi with the workforce and with representation as authors of peer-reviewed journal articles. From a list of courses offered in 2018–2019 at Washington University in St. Louis, we selected a stratified random sample of course syllabi from four disciplines (humanities; social science; science, technology, engineering, and mathematics; and other). We coded the gender of course instructors and course reading authors using the genderize application programming interface. We examined representation of female authors at the reading, course, and discipline level using descriptive statistics and data visualization. The final sample included 2435 readings from 129 unique courses. The mean percentage of female authors per reading was 34.1%; 822 (33.8%) of readings were female-led (i.e., a female first or sole author). Female authorship varied by discipline, with the highest percentage of female-led readings in social science (40%). Female instructors assigned a higher percentage of readings with female first authors and readings with higher percentages of females on authorship teams. The representation of female authors on syllabi was lower than representation of females as authors in the peer-reviewed literature or in workforce. Adding to evidence of the syllabi gender gap, we found that female authors were underrepresented as sole and first authors and as members of authorship teams. Since assigned readings promote academic scholarship and influence workforce diversity, we recommend several strategies to diversify the syllabi through increasing awareness of the gap and improving access to female-authored publications.
机译:新兴的证据表明,在某些领域的读数中,女性撰写的出版物并不是很好地代表,导致教学大会性别差距。缺乏代表可能会降低专业领域的机会的学生意识,劣势女性学者的职业成功。我们为教学大纲性别差距的证据做出了贡献:1)量化女性作者在指定的课程读数中代表的程度; 2)通过教练和纪律的性别审查女性作者的代表; 3)将女性表征与劳动力与劳动力的代表相比,作为同行评审期刊文章的作者。从2018-2019在圣路易斯华盛顿大学提供的课程清单中,我们从四个学科(人文学科;社会科学,科学,技术,工程和数学;和其他)中选择了一个分层的随机样本。我们使用Genderize应用程序编程界面编制了课程教练和课程阅读作者的性别。我们使用描述性统计和数据可视化检查了阅读,课程和纪律水平的女作家的代表。最终样本包括来自129个独特课程的2435读数。每读女作家的平均百分比为34.1%; 822(33.8%)的读数是女性主导(即女性第一或唯一作者)。女性作者因纪律而异,社会科学中的女性LED读数比例最高(40%)。女性教练在女性第一作者和读数中分配了更高比例的读数,并在作者团队中具有更高百分比的女性读数。女教义上的女性作者的代表低于同行评审文学或劳动力的作者的女性的代表性。我们发现女性作者被认为是唯一和第一作者,并作为作者团队成员的唯一作者。由于分配的读数促进学术奖学金和影响劳动力多样性,我们建议通过提高对差距的认识并改善对女性撰写的出版物的认识来多元化教学大纲的若干策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号