...
首页> 外文期刊>Theoretical Economics Letters >I Was Learning Economics at the Cost of the Economy
【24h】

I Was Learning Economics at the Cost of the Economy

机译:我正在以经济成本学习经济学

获取原文
           

摘要

COVID-19, a virus of the size of 0.12 microns, had crippled the global economy with 19.14 million people infected as of April 15, 2020, increased to 37.11 million as of October 11, 2020 as per the COVID-19 Weekly Epidemiological Update published by World Health Organization (WHO). The COVID -19 count as of March 23, 2021 was more than 122 million, suppressing the last year’s rate of growth of the same. Economic activities across the globe had been stalled after February 2020. The world has been caged in a Great Lockdown. For the vast majority of people, this has been the biggest economic upset of their lives. There were many causes of recession delineated in the contemporary research papers. Nevertheless, too many causes of the crisis, too many research papers, so many techniques for optimization and too many surveys, etc., frequently divert the focus. We should not lose focus in the sea of numerous causes of recession. Therefore, the objective of the present paper is more specific: “Was conservative/defensive stance in the risk management in the regulatory policymaking post-global financial recession (2007-10) foreboding or worthy?” . The subprime crisis of 2007-08 and the economic recession that followed and many significant economic and socio political events after 2010, e.g., the sovereign debt crisis in Greece, European credit crisis, Brexit, the Venezuelan hyperinflation in 2014, China-United State trade war (July 6, 2018-present), etc., had left many economists on the defensive stance in the policy research/policy prescriptions. We can’t deny that scholars belonging to pre- and post-global financial crisis (2007-2010) generally possessed opposite views. For example, Berkowitz and O’Brien (2002) argued that 99th percentile VaR forecasts were conservative; however, recommendations by the BASEL committee of banking supervision (BCBS) since 2010 were 99th and 99.9th percentile VaR forecasts. It is difficult to judge if economic policies post-global financial crisis were impartial or for espousing a specific interest group/lobby. It is furthermore difficult to speculate if economic policies after 2010 were influenced by the great recession (2007-10)’s debilitating impacts.
机译:Covid-19,一个大小的病毒为0.12微米,在2020年4月15日截至2020年4月15日,全球经济削弱了191.4万人,截至2020年10月11日的3711万,根据Covid-19每周流行病学更新发布世界卫生组织(谁)。截至3月23日的Covid -19计数超过1.22亿,抑制去年的增长率同样的增长率。 2020年2月在全球的经济活动被停滞不前。世界一直在锁上持续的封锁。对于绝大多数人来说,这是他们生命中最大的经济不安。当代研究论文中有很多经济衰退的原因。尽管如此,危机的原因太多,太多的研究论文,这么多的优化技术以及太多的调查等,经常转移焦点。我们不应该在大量经济衰退原因中失去焦点。因此,本文的目的是更具体的:“在监管政策制定后全球金融经济衰退(2007-10)的预防或不值得的风险管理中是保守/防守姿态?” 。 2007 - 08年的次贷危机和2010年后遵循的经济经济衰退以及许多重要的经济和社会政治事件,例如希腊的主权债务危机,欧洲信贷危机,2014年,委内瑞拉过度下的委内瑞拉永纳,中国 - 美国 - 美国贸易战争(2018年7月6日至今)等,留下了许多经济学家在政策研究/政策处方的防守立场上。我们无法否认属于全球后和全球后金融危机(2007 - 2010年)的学者普遍具有相反的观点。例如,Berkowitz和O'Brien(2002年)认为,第99百分位数预测是保守的;但是,自2010年以来的银行监管巴塞尔委员会(BCBS)的建议是第99和99.9百分位数预测。如果经济政策后全球金融危机是公正的或支持特定的利益小组/大厅,则难以判断。如果2010年以后的经济政策受到巨大衰退(2007-10)的衰弱的影响,则难以推测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号