...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >The Problem (and the Answer?) to the Limited Availability of Pain Psychologists: Can Clinical Social Workers Help?
【24h】

The Problem (and the Answer?) to the Limited Availability of Pain Psychologists: Can Clinical Social Workers Help?

机译:问题(和答案?)有限的痛苦心理学家:临床社会工作者可以帮助吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

American chronic pain medicine has been in a state of crisis for many years, with the overall quality of care continuing to deteriorate. In a 3-part series published in 2008, Giordano and Schatman discussed this crisis,1–3 elucidating the notion that chronic pain care would not reach its potential if we failed to emphasize multidisciplinary care focused on the needs of patients. More than a decade later, it is quite apparent that our warnings were not heeded. Much of this failure has been related to the devolution of the “profession” of pain medicine to the “business” of pain medicine,4 which has been due to numerous factors. These have included, but not necessarily been limited to, the malevolent dominance of the health insurance industry, 5,6 progressive corporatization,7 fraudulent marketing,8 industry’s detrimental influence on medical education,9,10 a lack of undergraduate medical education in pain management,11 and, of course, the profound swing of the “opioid pendulum” from reckless opiophilia to its current zeitgeist of often cruel opiophobia,12–14 and last but not least, the demise of interdisciplinary pain care.
机译:美国慢性疼痛医学一直处于危机状态多年,整体护理质量继续恶化。在2008年发布的3部分系列中,Giordano和Schatman讨论了这一危机,1-3阐明了慢性疼痛护理,如果我们未能强调患者需求的多学科护理,慢性疼痛护理不会达到其潜力。十多年后,很明显,我们的警告没有被注意到。这种失败的大部分都与止痛药的“专业”的假冒有关,止痛药的“业务”,4,这是由于许多因素。这些已经包括,但不一定受到健康保险业的恶毒主导地位,5,6逐行公司化,7欺诈性营销,8个行业对医学教育的不利影响,9,10缺乏本科医学教育在止痛药中缺乏本科医学教育11,当然,当然,从鲁莽的鞘翅目前的“阿片类药物”的深刻摆动到其当前的恐惧症,12-14和最后但并非最不重要,跨学科疼痛护理的消亡。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号