首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Family and Reproductive Health >Comparison of Dydrogesterone and GnRH Antagonists for Prevention of Premature LH Surge in IVF/ICSI Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Comparison of Dydrogesterone and GnRH Antagonists for Prevention of Premature LH Surge in IVF/ICSI Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:Dydrogestone和GNRH拮抗剂预防IVF / ICSI循环早熟LH激增的比较:随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the effect of dydrogesterone and Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists on prevention of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women undergoing Invitro fertilization/ Intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). Materials and methods: In a Randomized controlled trial (RCT), two-hundred eligible women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) /intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment were randomly assigned into two groups. Human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) was administered for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in both groups. Intervention group (group 1) received 20 mg dydrogesterone from day 2 of menstrual cycle till trigger day and control group (group2) received GnRH antagonist from the day that leading follicle reached 13 mm in diameter till trigger day. Serum levels of LH, estradiol and progesterone were measured on the trigger day. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of a premature LH surge, and the secondary outcomes investigated were the chemical and clinical pregnancy rates in the first FET cycles. Results: There were no significant differences in patients' age, BMI, AMH levels, previous IVF cycle, and cause of infertility between the two groups. None of the patients in two groups experienced a premature luteinizing hormone surge. The numbers of retrieved oocytes, the MII oocytes and good quality embryos, were significantly higher in the intervention group than antagonist group (p 0.05). The overall chemical pregnancy rate in intervention group (43/91: 46.2%) and control group (45/91: 49.5%) (p = 0.820) was similar. Meanwhile, the clinical pregnancy rate was similar between groups too. Conclusion: Regarding the cost, efficacy and easy usage of dydrogestrone, it may be reasonable to use it as an alternative to GnRH antagonist for the prevention of premature LH surge.
机译:目的:比较莫德罗酮和促性腺激素释放激素(GNRH)拮抗剂对预防invitro施肥/细胞质精子注射症(IVF / ICSI)的不孕妇女过早培氏激素(LH)激增和妊娠结果的影响。材料和方法:在随机对照试验(RCT)中,经过两组体外施肥(IVF)/ IntractoPlasmic精子注射(ICSI)处理的两百个符合条件的女性被随机分配到两组中。在两组中施用人类更年期促性腺激素(HMG)用于受控卵巢刺激(COS)。干预组(第1组)从月经周期第2天获得20毫克Dydrogestone,直到触发日和对照组(Group2)从前一天接受GnRH拮抗剂直径为13毫米直到触发日。在触发日测量血清水平的LH,雌二醇和黄体酮。主要结果措施是早熟LH激增的发生率,研究的二次结果是第一个FET循环中的化学和临床妊娠速率。结果:患者年龄,BMI,AMH水平,前IVF周期没有显着差异,以及两组之间不孕症的原因。两组患者均没有经历过早的叶黄素激素涌涌。检出的卵母细胞,MII卵母细胞和良好的胚胎的数量比拮抗剂组在干预组中显着高(P <0.05)。干预组的整体化学妊娠率(43/91:46.2%)和对照组(45/91:49.5%)(P = 0.820)是相似的。同时,临床妊娠率也相似。结论:关于Dydrogestone的成本,疗效和易用,可以合理地使用它作为GNRH拮抗剂预防早熟LH激增的替代品。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号