...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management >Accounting Treatment of Research and Development Expenditure: A Critical Literature Review
【24h】

Accounting Treatment of Research and Development Expenditure: A Critical Literature Review

机译:研究和开发支出的会计处理:关键文献综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Intangible investments have been found to contribute largely to value enhancement in firms and economies that spend colossus resources on them. Despite being an important component of valuation, such investments are largely ignored or given subjective treatment by the existing accounting standards and consequently, not included on firm valuation. The American standard (FASB-S2) establishes standards of financial accounting and reporting for research and development (R&D) costs. This Statement requires that R&D costs be charged to expense when incurred. It also requires a company to disclose in its financial statements the amount of R&D that it charges to expense. On the other hand, the accounting for R&D under IFRS standards requires judgment of the expectation of future economic benefit that will flow to the entity due to R&D. If it can be "ascertained", then these costs should be treated as an asset rather than an expense since they meet the definition of an asset as prescribed by the IASB Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements. This paper, therefore, seeks to critically analyze the literary works of various researchers on the treatment and hence the impact of accounting for research and development expenditure on: firstly, the value relevance of financial information to investors; secondly, allocation of equity and debt resources to the firm; thirdly, growth of intangible assets; and lastly, firm value in capital markets. Previously studies conducted under here have cut across the accounting treatment of R&D expenditure, and generally, internally generated intangibles using the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) and the U.S.' Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAPs). Majority of the studies analyzed agree that sufficient disclosure of R&D investment as well as other internally generated intangibles can supplement and improve the financial information provided by the firm. This in turn will improve the outlook of the financial statements which can improve their use and reliability to investors as well as give reliable inputs to financial analysts, thus improving the applied valuation models in computing dependable valuation figures for the firm. This, by and large, should avoid the negative consequences that may result from inadequate accounting treatment of R&D expenditures.
机译:已发现无形资金促进贡献,从而在将巨型资源的公司和经济上取得增值。尽管是估值的重要组成部分,但此类投资主要忽略或通过现有会计准则的主观待遇,因此,不包括在公司估值上。美国标准(FASB-S2)建立了研究和开发(研发)成本的财务会计和报告标准。该声明要求在招致时收取R&D费用费用。它还要求公司在其财务报表中披露,其收取费用的研发金额。另一方面,国际财务报告准则标准下的研发会计需要判断对未来经济效益的预期,由于研发为期将流向实体。如果可以“确定”,那么这些成本应该被视为资产而不是费用,因为它们符合IASB框架规定的资产定义,以便编制和介绍财务报表。因此,本文旨在批判性地分析各种研究人员的文学作品,从而核对研究和开发支出的影响:首先,财务信息对投资者的价值相关性;其次,将股权和债务资源分配给公司;第三,无形资产的增长;最后,资本市场的坚定价值。以前在此处进行的研究已经削减了研发支出的会计治疗,并且通常,使用国际财务报告标准(IFRSS)和美国的内部生成的无形资产。通常接受的会计原则(GAAPS)。分析的大多数研究都同意,R&D投资的充分披露以及其他内部生成的无形资产可以补充和改进公司提供的财务信息。这反过来将改善财务报表的展望,可以提高投资者的使用和可靠性,并为金融分析师提供可靠的投入,从而改善了计算估值模型的计算可靠估值数据。 BY和大量,应避免可能因对研发支出的核对处理而可能导致的负面后果。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号