...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Performance of PCR/Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry on Whole Blood for Detection of Bloodstream Microorganisms in Patients with Suspected Sepsis
【24h】

Performance of PCR/Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry on Whole Blood for Detection of Bloodstream Microorganisms in Patients with Suspected Sepsis

机译:PCR /电喷雾电离质谱对全血的性能进行疑似脓毒症患者血流微生物的全血

获取原文
           

摘要

Blood culture (BC) often fails to detect bloodstream microorganisms in sepsis. However, molecular diagnostics hold great potential. The molecular method PCR/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) can detect DNA from hundreds of different microorganisms in whole blood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of this method in a multicenter study including 16 teaching hospitals in the United States ( n ?=?13) and Europe ( n ?=?3). ABSTRACT Blood culture (BC) often fails to detect bloodstream microorganisms in sepsis. However, molecular diagnostics hold great potential. The molecular method PCR/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) can detect DNA from hundreds of different microorganisms in whole blood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of this method in a multicenter study including 16 teaching hospitals in the United States ( n ?=?13) and Europe ( n ?=?3). First, on testing of 2,754 contrived whole blood samples, with or without spiked microorganisms, PCR/ESI-MS produced 99.1% true-positive and 97.2% true-negative results. Second, among 1,460 patients with suspected sepsis (sepsis-2 definition), BC and PCR/ESI-MS on whole blood were positive in 14.6% and 25.6% of cases, respectively, with the following result combinations: BC positive and PCR/ESI-MS negative, 4.3%; BC positive and PCR/ESI-MS positive, 10.3%; BC negative and PCR/ESI-MS positive, 15.3%; and BC negative and PCR/ESI-MS negative, 70.1%. Compared with BC, PCR/ESI-MS showed the following sensitivities (coagulase-negative staphylococci not included): Gram-positive bacteria, 58%; Gram-negative bacteria, 78%; and Candida species, 83%. The specificities were?&94% for all individual species. Patients who had received prior antimicrobial medications ( n ?=?603) had significantly higher PCR/ESI-MS positivity rates than patients without prior antimicrobial treatment—31% versus 22% ( P ?&?0.0001)—with pronounced differences for Gram-negative bacteria and Candida species. In conclusion, PCR/ESI-MS showed excellent performance on contrived samples. On clinical samples, it showed high specificities, moderately high sensitivities for Gram-negative bacteria and Candida species, and elevated positivity rates during antimicrobial treatment. These promising results encourage further development of molecular diagnostics to be used with whole blood for detection of bloodstream microorganisms in sepsis.
机译:血液培养(BC)通常无法检测败血症中的血液微生物。但是,分子诊断具有巨大的潜力。分子法PCR /电喷雾电离质谱(PCR / ESI-MS)可以在全血中检测来自数百种不同微生物的DNA。本研究的目的是评估该方法在多中心研究中的表现,包括16个教学医院(N?=?13)和欧洲(n?=?3)。摘要血液培养(BC)经常在败血症中检测血液微生物。但是,分子诊断具有巨大的潜力。分子法PCR /电喷雾电离质谱(PCR / ESI-MS)可以在全血中检测来自数百种不同微生物的DNA。本研究的目的是评估该方法在多中心研究中的表现,包括16个教学医院(N?=?13)和欧洲(n?=?3)。首先,在测试2,754个创始的全血样,有或没有掺入的微生物,PCR / ESI-MS产生99.1%的真阳性和97.2%的真实负面结果。其次,在1,460名涉嫌脓毒症(Sepsis-2定义)中,全血的BC和PCR / ESI-MS分别为14.6%和25.6%的病例,下列结果组合:BC阳性和PCR / ESI - 散数,4.3%; BC阳性和PCR / ESI-MS阳性,10.3%; BC阴性和PCR / ESI-MS阳性,15.3%;和BC阴性和PCR / ESI-MS阴性,70.1%。与BC相比,PCR / ESI-MS显示出以下敏感性(凝结酶 - 阴性葡萄球菌未包含):革兰氏阳性细菌,58%;革兰氏阴性细菌,78%;和念珠菌物种,83%。所有单个物种的特异性是?& 94%。已接受前抗微生物药物的患者(n?=Δ603)显着高于没有现有抗菌治疗的患者的PCR / ESI-MS积极率显着较高-31%(p≤≤0.0001) - 克的明显差异 - 细菌和念珠菌物种。总之,PCR / ESI-MS对创新样品表现出优异的性能。在临床样品上,它显示出高特异性,革兰阴性细菌和念珠菌种类的中度高敏感性,以及抗菌治疗期间的阳性率升高。这些有希望的结果促进进一步发展分子诊断,以与全血一起使用以检测败血症中的血流微生物。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号