Can combined intracavitary/interstitial approach be an alternative to interstitial brachytherapy with the Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template (MUPIT) in computed tomography-guided adaptive brachytherapy for bulky and/or irregularly shaped gynecological tumors?

摘要

Background Interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) is an optional treatment for locally advanced gynecological tumours for which conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) would result in suboptimal dose coverage. However, ISBT with Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template (MUPIT), in which ~10-20 needles are usually applied, is more time-consuming and labor-intensive than ICBT alone, making it a burden on both practitioners and patients. Therefore, here we investigated the applicability of a combined intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS) approach in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for bulky and/or irregularly shaped gynecological tumours for which interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) was performed. Methods Twenty-one consecutive patients with gynecological malignancies treated with computed tomography-guided ISBT using MUPIT were analyzed as cases for this dosimetric study. For each patient, the IC/IS plan using a tandem and 1 or 2 interstitial needles, which was modeled after the combined IC/IS approach, was generated and compared with the IS plan based on the clinical ISBT plan, while the IC plan using only the tandem was applied as a simplified control. Maximal dose was prescribed to the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) while keeping the dose constraints of D_2cc bladder?2cc rectum? Results The average D90 HR-CTV was 77%, 118% and 140% in the IC, IC/IS and IS plans, respectively, where 6?Gy corresponds to 100%. The average of the ratio of D90 HR-CTV to D_2cc rectum (gain factor (GF) _rectum) in the IC, IC/IS and IS plans was 0.8, 1.3 and 1.5 respectively, while GF_bladder was 0.9, 1.4 and 1.6, respectively. In the IC/IS plan, D90 HR-CTV, GF_rectum and GF_bladder exceeded 100%, 1.0 and 1.0, respectively, in all patients. Conclusions These data demonstrated that the combined IC/IS approach could be a viable alternative to ISBT for gynecological malignancies with bulky and/or irregularly shaped tumours.