...
首页> 外文期刊>European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. >The efficacy of a mix of three probiotic strains in reducing abdominal pain and inflammatory biomarkers in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis
【24h】

The efficacy of a mix of three probiotic strains in reducing abdominal pain and inflammatory biomarkers in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis

机译:三种益生菌菌株在减少急性简单憩室炎中减少腹痛和炎症生物标志物中的疗效

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Acute Uncomplicated Diverticulitis (AUD) is defined as the inflammation of a colon diverticulum, often involving colic wall and pericolic fat. Conventional treatment of AUD includes antibiotics, usually ciprofloxacin and metronidazole, fasting, and fluid therapy. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a mix of three probiotic strains (Bifidobacterium lactis LA 304, Lactobacillus salivarius LA 302, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA 201; Lactibiane Iki?, Biocure [PiLeJe Groupe], Italy/PiLeJe Laboratoire, France) in association with conventional antibiotics in treating AUD compared to conventional antibiotics used alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 84 (25M/59F mean age 61.5 ± 11.5 years) consecutive patients who came to the Emergency Department of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli – IRCCS, Rome, Italy, with a diagnosis of AUD confirmed by CT scan. After routine blood test and dosage of C-reactive protein (C-RP), patients were randomly divided into two groups: Probiotic group (42 patients, 10M/32F mean age 32.23 ± 10.3 years) was treated with ciprofloxacin 400 mg twice a day and metronidazole 500 mg three times a day for one week and simultaneously supplemented with the probiotic mix, 1 sachet twice a day for 10 days. Control group (42 patients, 15M/27F mean age 59.01 ± 11.3 years) received the same antibiotic treatment without the probiotic mix. All patients filled a daily Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for assessment of abdominal pain, with a range value from 0 (asymptomatic) to 10, and CRP value was determined on admission and at discharge. RESULTS: As regards abdominal pain, on Day 3, Group A showed a significant decrease of 4.06 points (51.4%) in VAS score compared to a decrease of 2.79 points (34.9%) in Group B. On Day 5 the decrease was of 6.3 points (80%) in Group A and of 4.85 points (61%) in Group B. VAS score was reduced by 7.59 points (96%) in Group A and 6.1 points (76%) in Group B on Day 7 +, and by 7.8 points (99%) in Group A and 7.2 points (90%) in Group B on Day 10. About inflammation, Group A showed a decrease in C-RP value of 64%, compared to a decrease of only 35% in Group B. We also observed that the duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter for patients in Group A: 89 h (3.7 days) in Group A vs. 101 h (4.2 days) in Group B (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated showed that the supplement with the probiotic mix of Bifidobacterium lactis LA 304, Lactobacillus salivarius LA 302, and Lactobacillus acidophilus LA 201 in combination with the standard antibiotic therapy for AUD reduced abdominal pain and inflammation significantly more than antibiotic treatment used alone. These findings could be due to the anti-inflammatory activity of the probiotic mix. Larger studies are needed to validate its use in the clinical practice.
机译:目的:急性简单的憩室炎(AUD)定义为结肠憩室的炎症,通常涉及绞痛壁和亲切脂肪。常规治疗AUD包括抗生素,通常是环丙沙星和甲硝唑,禁食和液体治疗。本研究的目的是测试三种益生菌菌株的混合物(双歧杆菌La 304,Lactobacillus Salivarius La 302,LactobaCillus嗜酸杆菌La 201; Lactibiane Iki',Biocure [Pileje Groupe],意大利/ Pileje Laboratoire,法国)与单独使用的常规抗生素相比,与常规的抗生素相关联。患者和方法:我们注册了84名(25米/ 59F意味着年龄61.5±11.5岁),连续来到Follazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - Irccs,罗马,意大利的急救患者,通过CT扫描证实了澳元的诊断。在常规血液测试和C反应蛋白(C-RP)的剂量后,患者随机分为两组:益生菌组(42例患者,10M / 32F平均32.23±10.3岁)用环丙沙红星每天两次处理400毫克和甲硝唑500毫克每天三次一周,同时补充益生菌混合物,每天两次袋子10天。对照组(42例患者,15M / 27F平均59.01±11.3岁)在没有益生菌混合物的情况下获得相同的抗生素治疗。所有患者填充每日视觉模拟量表(VAS),用于评估腹痛,0(无症状)至10的范围值,并在入院和放电时测定CRP值。结果:关于腹痛,第3天,A组在VAS分数中显着降低了4.06点(51.4%),而B组的减少则减少。第5天,减少为6.3 B组A和4.85点(61%)的点(80%)在B组中的4.85点(61%)减少了7.59点(96%),第7天+第6段(B组)中的6.1点(76%),在第10组组A和7.2分(90%)中的7.8分(99%)。关于炎症,A组C-RP值减少64%,而仅下降35% B组。我们还观察到,A组A组(3.7天)的患者在B组(P = 0.03)中,住院治疗的持续时间明显较短(3.7天)(p = 0.03)。结论:我们的结果表明,补充剂与双歧杆菌LA 304,乳酸杆菌杆菌LA 304,乳酸杆菌和乳杆菌酸酐酸乳杆菌和乳杆菌治疗组合的补充剂与单独使用的抗生素治疗明显多于抗生素治疗的标准抗生素治疗。 。这些发现可能是由于益生菌混合物的抗炎活动。需要更大的研究来验证其在临床实践中的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号