...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine >A survey among Korea Medicine doctors (KMDs) in Korea on patterns of integrative Korean Medicine practice for lumbar intervertebral disc displacement: Preliminary research for clinical practice guidelines
【24h】

A survey among Korea Medicine doctors (KMDs) in Korea on patterns of integrative Korean Medicine practice for lumbar intervertebral disc displacement: Preliminary research for clinical practice guidelines

机译:韩国医学医生(KMDS)对腰椎间盘圆盘位移综合韩国医药实践模式的一项调查:临床实践指南的初步研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Patients seek Korean Medicine (KM) treatment for a broad range of complaints in Korea, but predominantly for musculoskeletal disorders. We investigated lumbar Intervertebral Disc Displacement (IDD) practice patterns of Korean Medicine doctors (KMDs) within a hospital/clinic network specializing in KM treatment of spinal disorders through survey of diagnosis and treatment methods. Methods Questionnaires on clinical practice patterns of KM treatment for lumbar IDD were distributed to 149 KMDs on January 25th, 2015. The questionnaire included items on sociodemographic characteristics, clinical practice patterns, and preferred method of lumbar IDD diagnosis and treatment. KMDs were asked to grade each treatment method for absolute and relative importance in treatment and prognosis, and safety. Results A total 79.19?% KMDs ( n =?118/149) completed the survey, and results showed that integrative care mainly consisting of acupuncture, herbal medicine, Chuna manipulation, and pharmacopuncture was administered to IDD patients. The participant KMDs largely relied on radiological findings (MRI and X-ray) for diagnosis. ‘Eight principle pattern identification’, ‘Qi and Blood syndrome differentiation’ and ‘Meridian system syndrome differentiation’ theories were generally used for KM syndrome differentiation. The most frequently prescribed herbal medication was Chungpa-jun, and most commonly used Chuna technique was ‘sidelying lumbar extension displacement treatment’. IDD patients received 1.9?±?0.3 treatment sessions/week, and KMDs estimated that an average 9.6?±?3.5?weeks were needed for 80?% pain relief. Conclusions This is the first study to investigate expert opinion on KM treatment of IDD. Further randomized controlled trials and clinical guidelines based on clinical practice patterns of KM are called for.
机译:背景患者寻求韩国药物(km)治疗韩国广泛的投诉,但主要用于肌肉骨骼障碍。我们通过诊断和治疗方法调查,在医院/诊所网络中调查了韩国医生(KMDS)的腰椎间盘位移(IDD)实践模式,专门从事脊柱障碍的脊髓疾病。方法对腰部IDD的临床实践调查表的问卷调查,腰部IDD的临床练习模式分布在149公里。调查问卷包括社会渗目特征,临床实践模式和腰椎IDD诊断和治疗的首选方法。 KMDS被要求为治疗和预后的绝对和相对重视和安全等待每种治疗方法。结果总计79.19?%KMDS(n =?118/149)完成了调查,结果表明,综合护理主要由针灸,草药,Chuna操纵和药物诊断给IDD患者组成。参与者KIMDS在很大程度上依赖于放射学发现(MRI和X射线)进行诊断。 '八个原则模式鉴定','qi和血液综合征分化'和“经络系统综合征分化”理论通常用于km综合征分化。最常见的草药药物是Chungpa-jun,最常用的Chuna技术是“腰椎延长位移处理”。 IDD患者收到1.9?±0.3治疗课程/周,KMDS估计平均9.6?±3.5?3.5?80?%疼痛缓解所需的时间。结论这是第一次调查专家意见对IDD的熟悉意见的研究。根据临床实践模式的进一步随机对照试验和临床指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号