...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Variable quantitation of Haemophilus influenzae type b anticapsular antibody by radioantigen binding assay.
【24h】

Variable quantitation of Haemophilus influenzae type b anticapsular antibody by radioantigen binding assay.

机译:无线电植物结合测定的嗜血杆菌流感型抗蛋白抗体的可变定量。

获取原文
           

摘要

The measurement of antibody to Haemophilus influenzae type b capsular polysaccharide is important in the study of natural immunity and in the immunogenicity evaluation of H. influenzae type b vaccines. Several radioantigen binding assays (RABA) have been developed to measure H. influenzae type b anticapsular antibody, but recent immunogenicity data obtained with structurally similar vaccines suggest major differences in antibody quantitation in different laboratories. To evaluate interlaboratory variability in the measurement of anticapsular antibody levels, we blindly evaluated a sample of 40 pre- and postimmunization sera by eight RABAs in different laboratories. Evaluation of RABA methods revealed differences in polysaccharide antigens, radiolabeling methods, concentration and volume of antigen and antibody, and other assay methods. The reported results of assays varied significantly between laboratories (up to sixfold differences in geometric means), in part because of differences in assay sensitivity and different proportions of samples having undetectable levels of antibody (0 to 65% of specimens with undetectable levels). After standardizing the limit of sensitivity for all assays (0.125 microgram/ml), the results of all combinations of paired analyses of RABA assays correlated well (r = 0.88 to 0.99) but the geometric mean levels still varied as much as twofold. For individual sera, the differences between paired assays often were substantial (P less than or equal to 0.0001, paired t test), with some results varying as much as 64-fold. Differences were greatest for lower levels of antibody. There was good comparability and interlaboratory reproducibility of some assays but not of others. Intrinsic or extrinsic labeling of the antigen was not a major determinant of comparability. In most instances, the current variation in the quantitation of antibody levels by these assays precludes interassay comparisons. A standardized measurement of antibody needs to be developed to adequately compare results between different H. influenzae type b immunogenicity studies.
机译:嗜血杆菌型B型荚膜多糖的抗体的测量对于自然免疫和甲型流感B型疫苗的免疫原性评估是重要的。已经开发了几种放射性甾酮结合测定(RABA)以测量H型甲型型B型抗抗体抗体,但在结构相似的疫苗中获得的最近获得的免疫原性数据表明不同实验室中的抗体定量的主要差异。为了评估抗抗分抗体水平测量的互联变异,我们盲目地评估了八个Rabas在不同实验室中的40例和后解药血清的样品。 Raba方法的评价揭示了多糖抗原,放射性标记方法,抗原和抗体的浓度和体积的差异,以及其他测定方法。据报道的测定结果在实验室之间有显着变化(几何手段的六倍差异),部分原因部分是由于测定敏感性的差异和具有未检测到的抗体水平的样本的不同比例(0至65%具有未检测水平的样本)。在标准化所有测定(0.125微克/ mL)的灵敏度极限之后,Raba测定的成对分析的所有组合的结果相关井(r = 0.88至0.99),但几何平均水平仍然像双重变化一样多。对于个体血清,配对测定之间的差异通常很大(p小于或等于0.0001,配对T测试),一些结果变化多达64倍。较低水平的抗体差异最大。一些测定的可比性和互上的可再现性,但不是其他的分析。抗原的内在或外在标记不是可比性的主要决定因素。在大多数情况下,这些测定法定量抗体水平定量的当前变化妨碍了茚地段比较。需要开发抗体的标准化测量以在不同H.Focleenzae B型免疫原性研究之间进行充分比较结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号