...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Storage of Sputum in Cetylpyridinium Chloride, OMNIgene.SPUTUM, and Ethanol Is Compatible with Molecular Tuberculosis Diagnostic Testing
【24h】

Storage of Sputum in Cetylpyridinium Chloride, OMNIgene.SPUTUM, and Ethanol Is Compatible with Molecular Tuberculosis Diagnostic Testing

机译:痰在氯化十六烷基吡啶,OMNIgene.SPUTUM和乙醇中的存储与分子结核病诊断测试兼容

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We compared cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), ethanol (ETOH), and OMNIgene.SPUTUM (OMNI) for 28-day storage of sputum at ambient temperature before molecular tuberculosis diagnostics. Three sputum samples were collected from each of 133 smear-positive tuberculosis (TB) patients (399 sputum samples). ABSTRACT We compared cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), ethanol (ETOH), and OMNIgene.SPUTUM (OMNI) for 28-day storage of sputum at ambient temperature before molecular tuberculosis diagnostics. Three sputum samples were collected from each of 133 smear-positive tuberculosis (TB) patients (399 sputum samples). Each patient’s sputum was stored with either CPC, ETOH, or OMNI for 28?days at ambient temperature, with subsequent rpoB amplification targeting a short fragment (81 bp, GeneXpert MTB/RIF [Xpert]) or a long fragment (1,764 bp, in-house nested PCR). For 36 patients, Xpert was also performed at baseline on all 108 fresh sputum samples. After the 28-day storage (D28), Xpert positivity did not significantly differ between storage methods. In contrast, higher positivity for rpoB nested PCR was obtained with OMNI ( n = 125, 94%) than with ETOH ( n = 114, 85.7%; P = 0.001). Smears with scanty acid-fast bacilli (AFB) had lower rpoB PCR positivity with ETOH storage ( n = 10, 41.7%) than with CPC ( n = 16, 66.7%; difference, 25%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5 to 46.5; P = 0.031) or OMNI ( n = 16, 69.6%; difference, 26.1%; 95% CI, 3.8 to 48.4; P = 0.031), with no difference between CPC and OMNI. Poststorage, the threshold cycle ( C _(T) ) values significantly decreased compared to those prestorage with ETOH (difference, ?1.1; 95% CI, ?1.6 to ?0.6; P = 0.0001) but not with CPC ( P = 0.915) or OMNI ( P = 0.33). For one patient’s ETOH- and CPC-stored specimens with a C _(T) of &10, Xpert gave results of rifampin false resistant at D28, which was resolved by repeating Xpert on a 1/100 diluted specimen. In conclusion, 28-day storage of sputum in OMNI, CPC, or ETOH at ambient temperature does not impact short-fragment PCR (Xpert), including for low smear grades. However, for long-fragment PCR, ETOH yielded a lower PCR positivity for low smear grades, while the performance of OMNI and CPC was excellent for all smear grades. (The study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT02744469.)
机译:在分子结核病诊断之前,我们比较了氯化十六烷基吡啶鎓(CPC),乙醇(ETOH)和OMNIgene.SPUTUM(OMNI)在环境温度下痰液储存28天的情况。从133名涂片阳性结核病(TB)患者中分别收集了3份痰标本(399份痰标本)。摘要我们比较了十六烷基吡啶氯化物(CPC),乙醇(ETOH)和OMNIgene.SPUTUM(OMNI)在分子结核病诊断之前在环境温度下痰液储存28天的情况。从133名涂片阳性结核病(TB)患者中分别收集了3份痰标本(399份痰标本)。每个患者的痰液在室温下与CPC,ETOH或OMNI一起储存28天,随后的rpoB扩增靶向一个短片段(81 bp,GeneXpert MTB / RIF [Xpert])或一个长片段(1,764 bp,在内部巢式PCR)。对于36例患者,还对所有108个新鲜痰样本在基线时进行了Xpert。储存28天(D28)后,Xpert阳性率在两种储存方法之间没有显着差异。相比之下,与ETOH(n = 114,85.7%; P = 0.001)相比,OMNI(n = 125,94%)对rpoB巢式PCR的阳性率更高。含抗酸杆菌(AFB)的涂片与ETOH(n = 16、66.7%;差异为25%; 95%置信区间[CI])相比,在ETOH存储下的rpoB PCR阳性率较低(n = 10,41.7%), 3.5至46.5; P = 0.031)或OMNI(n = 16,69.6%;差异为26.1%; 95%CI为3.8至48.4; P = 0.031),而CPC和OMNI之间没有差异。与使用ETOH进行存储之前相比,存储后的阈值循环值(C _(T))值显着降低(差异,≥1.1; 95%CI,≤1.6至≤0.6; P = 0.0001),而对于CPC而言则没有(P = 0.915)或OMNI(P = 0.33)。对于一位患者的ETOH和CPC存储的C _(T)<10的标本,Xpert在D28给出了利福平假抗性的结果,可以通过在1/100稀释的标本上重复Xpert来解决。总之,在室温下将痰在OMNI,CPC或ETOH中储存28天不会影响短片段PCR(Xpert),包括低涂片等级。但是,对于长片段PCR,对于低涂片等级,ETOH产生较低的PCR阳性,而对于所有涂片等级,OMNI和CPC的性能均优异。 (该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT02744469。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号