...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Optimized Use of the MALDI BioTyper System and the FilmArray BCID Panel for Direct Identification of Microbial Pathogens from Positive Blood Cultures
【24h】

Optimized Use of the MALDI BioTyper System and the FilmArray BCID Panel for Direct Identification of Microbial Pathogens from Positive Blood Cultures

机译:优化使用MALDI BioTyper系统和FilmArray BCID面板直接鉴定阳性血液培养物中的微生物病原体

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Despite the current reliance on blood cultures (BCs), the diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSIs) can be sped up using new technologies performed directly on positive BC bottles. Two methods (the MALDI BioTyper system and FilmArray blood culture identification [BCID] panel) are potentially applicable. In this study, we performed a large-scale clinical evaluation (1,585 microorganisms from 1,394 BSI episodes) on the combined use of the MALDI BioTyper and FilmArray BCID panel compared to a reference (culture-based) method. As a result, the causative organisms of 97.7% (1,362/1,394) of the BSIs were correctly identified by our MALDI BioTyper and FilmArray BCID-based algorithm. Specifically, 65 (5.3%) out of 1,223 monomicrobial BCs that provided incorrect or invalid identifications with the MALDI BioTyper were accurately detected by the FilmArray BCID panel; additionally, 153 (89.5%) out of 171 polymicrobial BCs achieved complete identification with the FilmArray BCID panel. Conversely, full use of the MALDI BioTyper would have resulted in the identification of only 1 causative organism in 97/171 (56.7%) of the polymicrobial cultures. By applying our diagnostic algorithm, the median time to identification was shortened (19.5 h versus 41.7 h with the reference method; P < 0.001), and the minimized use of the FilmArray BCID panel led to a significant cost savings. Twenty-six out of 31 microorganisms that could not be identified were species/genera not designed to be detected with the FilmArray BCID panel, indicating that subculture was not dispensable for a few of our BSI episodes. In summary, the fast and effective testing of BC bottles is realistically adoptable in the clinical microbiology laboratory workflow, although the usefulness of this testing for the management of BSIs remains to be established.
机译:尽管当前依赖于血液培养(BCs),但是可以使用直接在阳性BC瓶上直接进行的新技术来加快对血流感染(BSI)的诊断。两种方法(MALDI BioTyper系统和FilmArray血液培养物鉴定[BCID]面板)可能适用。在这项研究中,与参考(基于培养物)方法相比,我们对MALDI BioTyper和FilmArray BCID面板的组合使用进行了大规模的临床评估(来自1,394 BSI发作的1,585种微生物)。结果,通过我们的MALDI BioTyper和FilmArray BCID算法可以正确识别97.7%(1,362 / 1,394)的BSI的病原生物。具体来说,通过FilmArray BCID面板可以准确地检测到1,223个提供MALDI BioTyper标识错误或无效的单微生物BC中的65个(5.3%);此外,在171个微生物BC中,有153个(89.5%)通过FilmArray BCID面板实现了完全鉴定。相反,充分利用MALDI BioTyper将导致在97/171(56.7%)的多菌种培养物中仅鉴定出一种致病菌。通过应用我们的诊断算法,缩短了识别的中值时间(参考方法为19.5小时,而参考方法为41.7小时; P <0.001),而FilmArray BCID面板的最小化使用导致了可观的成本储蓄。在31种无法识别的微生物中,有26种是无法通过FilmArray BCID面板检测到的物种/属,这表明在我们的BSI发作中,亚培养并不是必不可少的。总而言之,尽管仍有待确定这种测试对BSI管理的有用性,但在临床微生物学实验室工作流程中实际上可以采用快速有效的BC瓶测试。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号