...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of the BD Max MRSA XT Assay for Use with Different Swab Types
【24h】

Evaluation of the BD Max MRSA XT Assay for Use with Different Swab Types

机译:与不同拭子类型配合使用的BD Max MRSA XT分析的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

We evaluated the performance of the BD Max MRSA XT assay for use with different swab types. The 90% detection rates (95% confidence intervals) were 387 (97 to 1,551), 877 (238 to 3,230), 986 (183 to 5,287), 1,292 (328 to 5,078), 2,400 (426 to 13,518), and 5,848 (622 to 55,021) CFU/swab for Liquid Stuart, Liquid Amies, dry, Amies Gel without charcoal, ESwab collection, and Amies gel with charcoal swabs (Becton Dickinson), respectively. Amies Gel without charcoal, ESwab collection, and Amies gel with charcoal swabs had a tendency to be less sensitive, but none of the differences was statistically significant.
机译:我们评估了BD Max MRSA XT 分析法与不同拭子类型配合使用的性能。 90%的检出率(95%置信区间)为387(97至1,551),877(238至3,230),986(183至5,287),1,292(328至5,078),2,400(426至13,518)和5,848( 622至55,021)CFU /棉签分别用于Liquid Stuart,Liquid Amies,干,无木炭的Amies凝胶,ESwab收集和带有木棉签的Amies凝胶(Becton Dickinson)。不带木炭,ESwab收集的Amies凝胶和带木棉签的Amies凝胶倾向于不那么敏感,但差异均无统计学意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号