...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Field Validation of SYBR Green- and TaqMan-Based Real-Time PCR Using Biopsy and Swab Samples To Diagnose American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis in an Area Where Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis Is Endemic
【24h】

Field Validation of SYBR Green- and TaqMan-Based Real-Time PCR Using Biopsy and Swab Samples To Diagnose American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis in an Area Where Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis Is Endemic

机译:基于活检和拭子样本的基于SYBR Green和TaqMan的实时PCR的现场验证,以诊断巴西利什曼原虫(Viannia)流行地区的美国皮氏利什曼病

获取原文
           

摘要

The precise diagnosis of American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) is an essential task due to the disease's associated morbidity. A noninvasive, extremely sensitive, and highly specific exam is critical, particularly for mucosal leishmaniasis (ML), in which a low parasite quantity is expected. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of swab and biopsy sample analysis using SYBR Green- and TaqMan-based real-time PCR (qPCR) assays with that of a composite reference standard consisting of the Montenegro skin test, serology, histopathology, smears, culture, and conventional PCR. In total, 55 patients with ATL (ML, 18 patients; cutaneous leishmaniasis [CL], 37 patients) and 36 patients without ATL were studied. qPCR analysis of swabs was more accurate when using SYBR Green (87.88%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 77.86 to 93.73 patients) than when using TaqMan (78.79%; 95% CI, 67.49 to 86.92%) (P = 0.031). SYBR Green (84.72%; 95% CI, 74.68 to 91.25%) was also more accurate than TaqMan (73.61%; 95% CI, 62.42 to 82.41%) for biopsy samples (P = 0.008). All qPCR methods were 100% specific. Swabs and biopsy specimens had similar sensitivity when using the same chemistry (P = 0.125 for SYBR Green and P = 0.625 for TaqMan). Moreover, qPCR achieved better performance than most existing techniques used for the diagnosis of ATL and also detected the Leishmania parasite in a greater proportion of patients than the associated histopathology, smear, culture, and conventional PCR techniques did. Swabs therefore represent a useful diagnostic tool because they not only are noninvasive but also can achieve an accuracy similar to that of biopsy samples. The high accuracy of SYBR Green-based qPCR may also reduce the requirement for associated parasitological tests for ATL diagnosis.
机译:由于该病的相关发病率,准确诊断美国四肢利什曼病(ATL)是一项必不可少的任务。非侵入性,高度敏感且高度特异性的检查至关重要,特别是对于预期寄生虫数量较少的粘膜利什曼病(ML)尤其如此。我们旨在比较使用基于SYBR Green和TaqMan的实时PCR(qPCR)分析的拭子和活检样品分析的诊断准确性,以及由黑山皮肤测试,血清学,组织病理学,涂片,培养物组成的复合参考标准的诊断准确性和常规PCR。总共研究了55例ATL患者(ML,18例;皮肤利什曼病[CL],37例)和36例无ATL的患者。与使用TaqMan(78.79%; 95%CI,67.49至86.92%)相比,使用SYBR Green(87.88%; 95%置信区间[CI],77.86至93.73例患者)的棉签qPCR分析更准确( P = 0.031)。对于活检样品( P = 0.008),SYBR Green(84.72%; 95%CI,74.68至91.25%)也比TaqMan(73.61%; 95%CI,62.42至82.41%)更准确。所有qPCR方法均为100%特异性。当使用相同的化学方法时,拭子和活检标本具有相似的灵敏度(对于SYBR Green, P = 0.125,对于TaqMan, P = 0.625)。此外,与相关的组织病理学,涂片,培养和常规PCR技术相比,qPCR的性能优于大多数用于诊断ATL的现有技术,并且在更多患者中检出了利什曼原虫。因此,拭子是一种有用的诊断工具,因为它们不仅是无创的,而且可以达到与活检样本相似的准确性。基于SYBR Green的qPCR的高精度也可以减少对ATL诊断相关的寄生虫学测试的需求。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号