...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Monitoring of Cytomegalovirus Viral Loads by Two Molecular Assays in Whole-Blood and Plasma Samples from Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
【24h】

Monitoring of Cytomegalovirus Viral Loads by Two Molecular Assays in Whole-Blood and Plasma Samples from Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

机译:通过从造血干细胞移植受者的全血和血浆样品中的两种分子分析监测巨细胞病毒的病毒载量

获取原文
           

摘要

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral loads in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are typically monitored using quantitative molecular assays. The Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan CMV test (Cobas CMV) has recently been cleared by the FDA for the monitoring of CMV viral loads in plasma samples from transplant patients. In this study, we compare and correlate the viral loads obtained by a laboratory-developed test (LC CMV) (using Roche analyte-specific reagents [ASR] on the LightCycler 2.0) on whole-blood specimens with those obtained on corresponding plasma and whole-blood specimens by the Cobas CMV assay. Testing was performed on 773 archived patient specimens. The strength of the agreement was good for the two assays performed on whole blood (κ = 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.7) and moderate when the tests were performed on different sample types (κ = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.62 for the LC CMV whole blood [WB] assay versus Cobas plasma [PL], and κ = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.65 for the Cobas WB assay versus Cobas PL), although the difference was not statistically significant. Using a combination gold standard (i.e., a true positive was a specimen that was positive by two or more methods), the sensitivity and specificity of the assays were 78.8% and 99.3% for the LC CMV assay, 85.2% and 98.1% for the Cobas CMV WB assay, and 100% and 90.5% for Cobas CMV PL assay, respectively. A comparison of the CMV viral load trends in both plasma and whole blood from a few patients with multiple positive successive samples showed similar slopes, with differences in the slope ranging from 0.01 to 0.22. However, the absolute value for individual viral load differed markedly with whole-blood viral loads, being on average 0.5- to 1.22-log higher than those in plasma. The Cobas CMV assay provides a valid option for the monitoring of viral loads in transplant patients. Due to its increased sensitivity, the detection of CMV DNA in patients with low viral loads (i.e., those below limit of quantification [LOQ]) is increased with the Cobas CMV assay in plasma specimens. Longitudinal prospective studies will be needed to examine the clinical significance of these low-level viral loads.
机译:通常使用定量分子测定法监测造血干细胞移植(HSCT)受者中的巨细胞病毒(CMV)病毒载量。 FDA最近批准了Roche Cobas AmpliPrep / Cobas TaqMan CMV测试(Cobas CMV),用于监测移植患者血浆样品中的CMV病毒载量。在这项研究中,我们比较并关联了实验室开发的测试(LC CMV)(在LightCycler 2.0上使用Roche分析物特异性试剂[ASR])在全血标本上获得的病毒载量与在相应血浆和整个标本上获得的载量Cobas CMV分析测定血样。对773个存档的患者标本进行了测试。该协议的强度对于在全血中进行的两种测定(κ= 0.6; 95%置信区间[CI],0.51至0.7)是好的,而在不同类型的样品上进行测定时(κ= 0.54; 95% LC CMV全血[WB]分析与Cobas血浆[PL]的CI为0.47至0.62,κ= 0.57; 95%CI,Cobas WB分析与Cobas PL的CI为0.5至0.65),尽管差异无统计学意义重大。使用组合金标准液(即,真实阳性是通过两种或更多种方法呈阳性的样本),LC CMV测定的灵敏度和特异性分别为78.8%和99.3%,LC CMV测定的灵敏度和特异性分别为85.2%和98.1% Cobas CMV WB分析,以及Cobas CMV PL分析分别为100%和90.5%。对具有多个连续阳性样本的几例患者血浆和全血中CMV病毒载量趋势的比较显示出相似的斜率,斜率差异范围为0.01到0.22。但是,单个病毒载量的绝对值与全血病毒载量明显不同,平均比血浆中的值高0.5-1.22 log。 Cobas CMV分析为监测移植患者的病毒载量提供了有效的选择。由于其灵敏度提高,因此在血浆样本中进行Cobas CMV测定可提高对低病毒载量(即低于定量限[LOQ]的患者)中CMV DNA的检测。纵向前瞻性研究将需要检查这些低水平病毒载量的临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号