...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and Real-Time PCR Assays for Detecting Bacteroides fragilis in Clinical Samples
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and Real-Time PCR Assays for Detecting Bacteroides fragilis in Clinical Samples

机译:常规和实时PCR检测临床样品中脆弱拟杆菌的比较评估

获取原文
           

摘要

A conventional PCR and a real-time PCR for detecting Bacteroides fragilis were evaluated against clinical specimens. Analytical sensitivities were 100 and 40 fg of DNA, respectively. Detection limits were 100 and 10 CFU/ml, respectively. A total of six culture-negative specimens were positive by PCR. Altering the gold standard from “positive culture” to “positive culture or both PCR assays positive” resulted in sensitivities of 91.7% and 100%, respectively, and in specificities of 100% and 98.6%, respectively.
机译:针对临床标本评估了用于检测脆弱拟杆菌的常规PCR和实时PCR。分析灵敏度分别为100和40 fg DNA。检测限分别为100和10 CFU / ml。通过PCR,总共六个培养阴性样品为阳性。将金标准从“阳性培养物”更改为“阳性培养物或两个PCR检测均为阳性”,灵敏度分别为91.7%和100%,特异性分别为100%和98.6%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号