...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of the Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Spot and CMV QuantiFERON Cell-Mediated Immune Assays in CMV-Seropositive and -Seronegative Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women
【24h】

Comparison of the Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Spot and CMV QuantiFERON Cell-Mediated Immune Assays in CMV-Seropositive and -Seronegative Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women

机译:巨细胞病毒(CMV)酶联免疫吸附斑点和CMV血清阳性和-阴性孕妇和非孕妇CMV QuantiFERON细胞介导的免疫分析的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of congenital infection leading to birth defects and sensorineural anomalies, including deafness. Recently, cell-mediated immunity (CMI) in pregnant women has been shown to correlate with congenital CMV transmission. In this study, two interferon gamma release assays (IGRA), the CMV enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) and CMV QuantiFERON assays, detecting CMV-specific CMI were compared. These assays were performed for 80 CMV-infected (57 primarily and 23 nonprimarily) pregnant women and 115 controls, including 89 healthy CMV-seropositive pregnant women without active CMV infection, 15 CMV-seronegative pregnant women, and 11 seropositive or seronegative nonpregnant women. Statistical tests, including frequency distribution analysis, nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, Wilcoxon rank sum test for equality on unmatched data, and lowess smoothing local regression, were employed to determine statistical differences between groups and correlation between the assays. The CMV ELISPOT and CMV QuantiFERON assay data were not normally distributed and did not display equal variance. The CMV ELISPOT but not CMV QuantiFERON assay displayed significant higher values for primarily CMV-infected women than for the healthy seropositive pregnant and nonpregnant groups (P = 0.0057 and 0.0379, respectively) and those with nonprimary infections (P = 0.0104). The lowess local regression model comparing the assays on an individual basis showed a value bandwidth of 0.8. Both assays were highly accurate in discriminating CMV-seronegative pregnant women. The CMV ELISPOT assay was more effective than CMV-QuantiFERON in differentiating primary from the nonprimary infections. A substantial degree of variability exists between CMV ELISPOT and CMV QuantiFERON assay results for CMV-seropositive pregnant women.
机译:人巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染是导致先天性缺陷,导致出生缺陷和包括耳聋在内的感觉神经异常的主要原因。最近,已证明孕妇的细胞介导免疫(CMI)与先天性CMV传播相关。在这项研究中,比较了两种检测CMV特异性CMI的干扰素γ释放测定法(IGRA),CMV酶联免疫吸附点(ELISPOT)和CMV QuantiFERON测定法。对80名受CMV感染的孕妇(57名主要和23名非原发性孕妇)和115名对照进行了这些检测,包括89名健康的CMV血清阳性但未发生CMV感染的孕妇,15名CMV血清阴性的孕妇和11名血清阳性或血清阴性的孕妇。统计测试包括频率分布分析,非参数Kruskal-Wallis人口均等秩检验,Wilcoxon秩和检验(针对不匹配数据的均等性)和最低平滑局部回归,用于确定组之间的统计差异以及各测定之间的相关性。 CMV ELISPOT和CMV QuantiFERON分析数据不是正态分布的,并且没有显示均等的方差。 CMV ELISPOT法而非CMV QuantiFERON法显示,主要感染CMV的妇女的值显着高于健康血清反应阳性的孕妇和未怀孕组(分别为 P = 0.0057和0.0379)和非原发性感染组(< em> P = 0.0104)。比较各个测试的最低局部回归模型显示值带宽为0.8。两种测定在区分CMV血清阴性孕妇中均非常准确。在区分原发感染和非原发感染方面,CMV ELISPOT分析比CMV-QuantiFERON更有效。 CMV血清阳性孕妇的CMV ELISPOT和CMV QuantiFERON分析结果之间存在很大程度的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号