...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Development and Validation of Digital Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Ultrasensitive Detection and Quantification of Clostridium difficile Toxins in Stool
【24h】

Development and Validation of Digital Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Ultrasensitive Detection and Quantification of Clostridium difficile Toxins in Stool

机译:数字酶联免疫吸附测定方法的开发和验证,用于粪便中艰难梭菌毒素的超灵敏检测和定量

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The currently available diagnostics for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have major limitations. Despite mounting evidence that toxin detection is paramount for diagnosis, conventional toxin immunoassays are insufficiently sensitive and cytotoxicity assays too complex; assays that detect toxigenic organisms (toxigenic culture [TC] and nucleic acid amplification testing [NAAT]) are confounded by asymptomatic colonization by toxigenic C. difficile. We developed ultrasensitive digital enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for toxins A and B using single-molecule array technology and validated the assays using (i) culture filtrates from a panel of clinical C. difficile isolates and (ii) 149 adult stool specimens already tested routinely by NAAT. The digital ELISAs detected toxins A and B in stool with limits of detection of 0.45 and 1.5 pg/ml, respectively, quantified toxins across a 4-log range, and detected toxins from all clinical strains studied. Using specimens that were negative by cytotoxicity assay/TC/NAAT, clinical cutoffs were set at 29.4 pg/ml (toxin A) and 23.3 pg/ml (toxin B); the resulting clinical specificities were 96% and 98%, respectively. The toxin B digital ELISA was 100% sensitive versus cytotoxicity assay. Twenty-five percent and 22% of the samples positive by NAAT and TC, respectively, were negative by the toxin B digital ELISA, consistent with the presence of organism but minimal or no toxin. The mean toxin levels by digital ELISA were 1.5- to 1.7-fold higher in five patients with CDI-attributable severe outcomes, versus 68 patients without, but this difference was not statistically significant. Ultrasensitive digital ELISAs for the detection and quantification of toxins A and B in stool can provide a rapid and simple tool for the diagnosis of CDI with both high analytical sensitivity and high clinical specificity.
机译:对于艰难梭菌感染(CDI),当前可用的诊断方法存在主要局限性。尽管有越来越多的证据表明毒素检测对诊断至关重要,但是常规毒素免疫测定法灵敏度不够,细胞毒性测定法过于复杂。通过产毒艰难梭菌的无症状定殖,检测毒物生物的检测方法(毒物培养物[TC]和核酸扩增测试[NAAT])容易混淆。我们使用单分子阵列技术开发了针对毒素A和B的超灵敏数字酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),并使用(i)一组临床艰难梭菌分离物的培养滤液和(ii)149个成人粪便标本验证了该测定已经由NAAT例行测试。数字ELISA检测粪便中的毒素A和B的检出限分别为0.45和1.5 pg / ml,定量毒素范围为4个对数范围,并从所有研究的临床菌株中检出毒素。使用通过细胞毒性测定/ TC / NAAT呈阴性的标本,将临床临界值设为29.4 pg / ml(毒素A)和23.3 pg / ml(毒素B);产生的临床特异性分别为96%和98%。毒素B数字ELISA对细胞毒性测定具有100%的敏感性。 NAAT和TC阳性的样品中有25%和22%的毒素B数字ELISA阴性,这与生物体的存在一致,但毒素很少或没有。数字ELISA法测定的平均毒素水平在5例CDI可归因的严重预后患者中高出1.5至1.7倍,而无CDI可归因的患者中平均毒素水平高出68例,但这种差异无统计学意义。用于检测和定量粪便中毒素A和B的超灵敏数字ELISA可以为CDI诊断提供快速而简单的工具,具有很高的分析灵敏度和很高的临床特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号