...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Results of Disk Diffusion Testing with Cefoxitin Correlate with Presence of mecA in Staphylococcus spp.
【24h】

Results of Disk Diffusion Testing with Cefoxitin Correlate with Presence of mecA in Staphylococcus spp.

机译:头孢西丁的磁盘扩散测试结果与葡萄球菌中mecA的存在相关。

获取原文
           

摘要

The cefoxitin disk diffusion (DD) test for predicting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in staphylococci was assessed during a three-phase study. In phase 1, one laboratory tested 62 and 53 strains of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), respectively. These data were used to choose the provisional cefoxitin DD breakpoints (resistant/susceptible) of ≤19 mm/≥20 mm for S. aureus and ≤24 mm/≥25 mm for CoNS for the next phase of testing. In phase 2, 10 laboratories each tested approximately 40 in-house strains of staphylococci (half of which were S. aureus) using Mueller-Hinton agar from different manufacturers. In this phase, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of the cefoxitin disk test were 98 and 100% for S. aureus and 99 and 96% for CoNS. The cefoxitin DD test performed equivalently to oxacillin broth microdilution (BMD) and to oxacillin DD tests among S. aureus and mecA-positive CoNS strains but gave better results than oxacillin BMD or oxacillin DD for mecA-negative strains of CoNS. The cefoxitin DD test also was much easier to read and did not require the use of transmitted light for detection of resistance. Based on data from the first two phases, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; formerly NCCLS) adopted the use of the cefoxitin DD test for predicting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in staphylococci and revised Table 2C in CLSI document M100-S14 to reflect the change. In the third phase, an additional 61 challenge strains of CoNS for which the oxacillin MICs were 0.5 to 2 μg/ml were tested in a single laboratory to determine the effectiveness of the cefoxitin DD test for this group of borderline-resistant isolates. These data were used to refine the description of the test in CLSI document M100-S15. The cefoxitin DD test is preferred over the oxacillin DD test for predicting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in S. aureus and CoNS.
机译:在一项为期三个阶段的研究中,评估了头孢西丁圆盘扩散(DD)试验用于预测葡萄球菌中 mecA-介导的奥沙西林耐药性。在第1阶段,一个实验室分别测试了62株和53株金黄色葡萄球菌和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)。这些数据用于选择 S的临时头孢西丁DD断裂点(耐药/易感)≤19mm /≥20mm。对于下一阶段的测试,CoNS为金黄色且≤24mm /≥25mm。在第2阶段中,有10个实验室分别使用来自不同制造商的Mueller-Hinton琼脂测试了大约40种内部葡萄球菌菌株(其中一半是 S。aureus )。在此阶段,头孢西丁纸片试验对 S的敏感性和特异性分别为98%和100%。金黄色,CoNS分别为99%和96%。在 S中,头孢西丁DD试验的效果与奥沙西林肉汤微稀释液(BMD)和奥沙西林DD试验相当。金黄色葡萄球菌和 mecA 阳性CoNS菌株,但对CoNS的 mecA 阴性菌株,其效果优于奥沙西林BMD或奥沙西林DD。头孢西丁DD试验也更易于阅读,不需要使用透射光来检测电阻。根据前两个阶段的数据,临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI;以前称为NCCLS)采用了头孢西丁DD试验来预测葡萄球菌的 mecA-介导的奥沙西林耐药性,并修订了表2C。 CLSI文件M100-S14反映了这一变化。在第三阶段,在单个实验室中测试了其他61株CoNS菌株,其中奥沙西林MIC为0.5至2μg/ ml,以确定头孢西丁DD试验对于这组耐边界线菌株的有效性。这些数据用于完善CLSI文档M100-S15中的测试描述。在预测 S中的 mecA 介导的奥沙西林耐药性方面,头孢西丁DD试验优于奥沙西林DD试验。金黄色和CoNS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号