...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Multicenter Comparison of Serum and Whole-Blood Specimens for Detection of Aspergillus DNA in High-Risk Hematological Patients
【24h】

Multicenter Comparison of Serum and Whole-Blood Specimens for Detection of Aspergillus DNA in High-Risk Hematological Patients

机译:血清和全血标本在高危血液病患者中检测曲霉DNA的多中心比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Samples from patients at high risk for invasive aspergillosis (IA) were prospectively collected and analyzed for the presence of molecular markers of fungal infection. Serum specimens were screened for galactomannan and Aspergillus DNA, and whole-blood specimens were screened only for Aspergillus DNA. Fungal infections were categorized according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) criteria. Forty-seven cases (proven and probable IA) and 31 controls (no evidence of IA) were selected retrospectively for this case-control study, comprising 803 samples, in order to determine the performance of whole-blood PCR, serum PCR, and serum galactomannan testing. Although no single assay was able to detect every case of IA, a combination of different assays provided the best performance. There was no significant difference between the use of whole-blood and serum specimens for PCR-based diagnosis of IA, but there was a trend for whole blood to be more sensitive (85% versus 79%) and to yield an earlier positive result (36 days versus 15 days) than for serum. However, DNA extraction from serum specimens is easier and faster than that from whole-blood specimens, and it allows the same specimen to be used for both galactomannan and PCR assays. In conclusion, the appropriate sample type for DNA extraction should be determined by the local requirements and the technical platforms available at each individual center. A combination of biomarker tests offered the best diagnostic utility for detecting IA.
机译:前瞻性收集高危浸润性曲霉病(IA)患者的样品,并分析其是否存在真菌感染的分子标记。筛选血清标本中的半乳甘露聚糖和曲霉DNA,仅筛选全血标本中的曲霉DNA。真菌感染是根据欧洲癌症/侵袭性真菌感染研究与治疗组织,国家过敏和传染病真菌病菌研究小组(EORTC / MSG)的标准进行分类的。为了确定全血PCR,血清PCR和血清的性能,本病例对照研究回顾性选择了47例病例(已证实和可能的IA)和31例对照(没有IA的证据),包括803个样本。半乳甘露聚糖测试。尽管没有一种单一的检测方法能够检测出每例IA,但不同检测方法的组合可以提供最佳的性能。使用全血样本和血清样本进行基于PCR的IA诊断之间没有显着差异,但是全血有更高的敏感性(85%比79%)并产生更早的阳性结果( 36天对比15天)。但是,从血清标本中提取DNA比从全血标本中提取DNA更容易,更快,并且可以将同一标本用于半乳甘露聚糖和PCR分析。总之,应根据当地要求和每个中心的技术平台来确定用于DNA提取的合适样品类型。生物标志物测试的组合为检测IA提供了最佳的诊断工具。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号