...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Performance Characteristics and Comparison of Abbott and artus Real-Time Systems for Hepatitis B Virus DNA Quantification
【24h】

Performance Characteristics and Comparison of Abbott and artus Real-Time Systems for Hepatitis B Virus DNA Quantification

机译:雅培和artus实时系统对乙型肝炎病毒DNA定量的性能特点和比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Virological monitoring of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is critical to the management of HBV infection. With several HBV DNA quantification assays available, it is important to use the most efficient testing system for virological monitoring. In this study, we evaluated the performance characteristics and comparability of three HBV DNA quantification systems: Abbott HBV real-time PCR (Abbott PCR), artus HBV real-time PCR with QIAamp DNA blood kit purification (artus-DB), and artus HBV real-time PCR with the QIAamp DSP virus kit purification (artus-DSP). The lower limits of detection of these systems were established against the WHO international standards for HBV DNA and were found to be 1.43, 82, and 9 IU/ml, respectively. The intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation of plasma samples (1 to 6 log10 IU/ml) ranged between 0.05 to 8.34% and 0.16 to 3.48% for the Abbott PCR, 1.53 to 26.85% and 0.50 to 12.89% for artus-DB, and 0.29 to 7.42% and 0.94 to 3.01% for artus-DSP, respectively. Ninety HBV clinical samples were used for comparison of assays, and paired quantitative results showed strong correlation by linear regression analysis (artus-DB with Abbott PCR, r = 0.95; Abbott PCR with artus-DSP, r = 0.97; and artus-DSP with artus-DB, r = 0.94). Bland-Altman analysis showed a good level of agreement for Abbott PCR and artus-DSP, with a mean difference of 0.10 log10 IU/ml and limits of agreement of ?0.91 to 1.11 log10 IU/ml. No genotype-specific bias was seen in all three systems for HBV genotypes A, C, and D, which are predominant in this region. This finding illustrates that the Abbott real-time HBV and artus-DSP systems show more comparable performance than the artus-DB system, meeting the current guidelines for assays to be used in the management of hepatitis B.
机译:乙肝病毒(HBV)DNA的病毒学监测对HBV感染的管理至关重要。有了几种可用的HBV DNA定量检测方法,使用最高效的检测系统进行病毒学监测非常重要。在这项研究中,我们评估了三种HBV DNA定量系统的性能特征和可比性:雅培HBV实时PCR(Abbott PCR),QIAamp DNA试剂盒纯化的artus HBV实时PCR(artus-DB)和artus HBV使用QIAamp DSP病毒试剂盒纯化(artus-DSP)进行实时PCR。这些系统的检测下限是根据WHO关于HBV DNA的国际标准确定的,分别为1.43、82和9 IU / ml。 Abbott PCR的血浆样品的批内和批间变异系数(1至6 log 10 IU / ml)在0.05至8.34%和0.16至3.48%之间,在1.53至26.85%之间。 artus-DB分别为0.50至12.89%,artus-DSP为0.29至7.42%和0.94至3.01%。使用90个HBV临床样本进行测定比较,配对定量结果通过线性回归分析显示出强相关性(artus-DB和Abbott PCR, r = 0.95; Abbott PCR和artus-DSP, > r = 0.97;而带artus-DB的artus-DSP, r = 0.94)。 Bland-Altman分析显示Abbott PCR和artus-DSP的协议水平很高,平均差异为0.10 log 10 IU / ml,协议限制为0.91至1.11 log 10 IU / ml。在这三个区域主要存在的HBV基因型A,C和D的所有三个系统中,均未观察到基因型特异性偏倚。这一发现说明,雅培实时HBV和artus-DSP系统显示出比artus-DB系统更可比的性能,满足了目前用于管理乙型肝炎的检测指南。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号