...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Flocked and Rayon Swabs for Detection of Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus among Pathology Staff Members
【24h】

Comparison of Flocked and Rayon Swabs for Detection of Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus among Pathology Staff Members

机译:植绒和人造丝拭子在病理工作人员中检测金黄色葡萄球菌鼻支架的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Comparison of flocked swabs (E-swabs; Copan) to the standard rayon swabs (Copan) was undertaken for detection of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage among staff at Dorevitch Pathology in Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia. Among 100 volunteers, 36 were found to be colonized with S. aureus by one or both swab results. The prevalence detected by E-swabs was 35%, and the prevalence through rayon swabs was 34% (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference in proportions, ?12 to 14). Thirty-three volunteers tested positive with both types of swabs, while 2 were detected on E-swabs alone and another on rayon swab testing alone. There was no evidence of a significant difference in carriage detected by E-swabs or rayon swabs.
机译:在澳大利亚墨尔本海德堡的Dorevitch Pathology公司,对植绒拭子(E-拭子; Copan)与标准人造丝拭子(Copan)进行了比较,以检测金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔运输。在100名志愿者中,发现有36名被定植为 S。一个或两个拭子结果产生金黄色。通过电子拭子检测到的患病率为35%,通过人造丝拭子检测的患病率为34%(比例差异的可信度[95]为95%,约为12至14)。 33名志愿者对这两种棉签均呈阳性反应,而单独使用E型棉签则检测到2名,单独使用人造丝棉签进行测试的则是2名。没有证据表明电子拭子或人造丝拭子检测到的运输有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号