...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Sputum and Nasopharyngeal Aspirate Samples and of the PCR Gene Targets lytA and Spn9802 for Quantitative PCR for Rapid Detection of Pneumococcal Pneumonia
【24h】

Comparison of Sputum and Nasopharyngeal Aspirate Samples and of the PCR Gene Targets lytA and Spn9802 for Quantitative PCR for Rapid Detection of Pneumococcal Pneumonia

机译:痰液和鼻咽抽吸物样品以及PCR基因靶标lytA和Spn9802的比较,用于定量PCR快速检测肺炎球菌性肺炎

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We aimed to compare sputum and nasopharyngeal aspirate (NpA) samples and the PCR gene targets lytA and Spn9802 in quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays for rapid detection of pneumococcal etiology in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Seventy-eight adult patients hospitalized for radiologically confirmed CAP had both good-quality sputum and NpA specimens collected at admission. These samples were subjected to lytA qPCR and Spn9802 qPCR assays with analytical times of <3 h. Thirty-two patients had CAP with a pneumococcal etiology, according to conventional diagnostic criteria. The following qPCR positivity rates were noted in CAP cases with and without pneumococcal etiology: 96% and 15% (sputum lytA assay), 96% and 17% (sputum Spn9802 assay), 81% and 11% (NpA lytA assay), and 81% and 20% (NpA Spn9802 assay), respectively. The mean lytA and Spn9802 DNA levels were significantly higher in qPCR-positive sputum samples from cases with pneumococcal etiology than in qPCR-positive sputum samples from CAP cases without pneumococcal etiology or qPCR-positive NpA samples from cases with pneumococcal etiology (P < 0.02 for all comparisons). For detection of pneumococcal etiology, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that sputum specimens were superior to NpA specimens as the sample type (P < 0.02 for both gene targets) and lytA tended to be superior to Spn9802 as the gene target. The best-performing test, the sputum lytA qPCR assay, showed high sensitivity (94%) and specificity (96%) with a cutoff value of 105 DNA copies/ml. In CAP patients with good sputum production, this test has great potential to be used for the rapid detection of pneumococcal etiology and to target penicillin therapy.
机译:我们旨在比较定量PCR(qPCR)检测中痰和鼻咽抽吸物(NpA)样本以及PCR基因靶标 lytA 和Spn9802,以快速检测社区获得性肺炎(CAP)中的肺炎球菌病因。接受放射学证实的CAP住院治疗的78名成年患者入院时均采集了高质量的痰液和NpA标本。对这些样品进行 lytA qPCR和Spn9802 qPCR分析,分析时间<3 h。根据常规诊断标准,三十二名患有肺炎球菌病的CAP患者。在有和没有肺炎球菌病因的CAP病例中,注意到以下qPCR阳性率:96%和15%(痰 lytA 测定),96%和17%(痰Spn9802测定),81%和11% (NpA lytA 分析)和81%和20%(NpA Spn9802分析)。肺炎球菌病因病例的qPCR阳性痰标本中的平均 lytA 和Spn9802 DNA水平显着高于无肺炎球菌病因的CAP病例的qPCR阳性痰标本或患有肺炎球菌病因的qPCR阳性NpA样品肺炎球菌病因(所有比较的 P <0.02)。为了检测肺炎球菌病因,接受者操作特征曲线分析显示,随着样本类型(两个基因靶标的 P <0.02)和<​​em> lytA 的趋势,痰标本均优于NpA标本。作为基因靶标优于Spn9802。表现最好的测试是痰 lytA qPCR测定法,显示出高灵敏度(94%)和特异性(96%),其临界值为10 5 DNA拷贝/ ml 。在痰液产生良好的CAP患者中,该测试具有巨大潜力,可用于快速检测肺炎球菌病因和靶向青霉素治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号