...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Five Genotypic Techniques for Identification of Optochin-Resistant Pneumococcus-Like Isolates
【24h】

Comparison of Five Genotypic Techniques for Identification of Optochin-Resistant Pneumococcus-Like Isolates

机译:鉴定抗视蛋白性肺炎球菌的五种基因型技术的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Three PCR techniques (amplification of the psaA, ply, and lytA genes) and a commercial kit (AccuProbe [GenProbe, San Diego, Calif.], based on hybridization with the 16S rRNA gene), all four of which claimed to be specific for Streptococcus pneumoniae, were used to identify 49 alpha-hemolytic streptococcal isolates suspected of being pneumococci. The definite phenotypic identification of these organisms as S. pneumoniae was difficult when optochin susceptibility and the presence of a capsule were taken as markers. Furthermore, RsaI digestion of the amplified 16S rRNA gene was applied. All 49 strains were optochin resistant. Eleven of these were encapsulated and were identified as pneumococci by all tests. Twenty of the 38 unencapsulated strains were unambiguously identified as nonpneumococci by all tests. The identities of another 18 unencapsulated strains remained inconclusive due to highly variable reactions for all phenotypic and genotypic techniques applied. The AccuProbe test was positive for seven strains for which the results of the other tests were inconclusive. RsaI restriction of the amplified 16S rRNA gene confirmed the AccuProbe result for all strains, while the result of the psaA-specific PCR was in concordance with encapsulation for all strains. The results presented here indicate that identification problems continue to exist for some strains, despite the application of genotypic and phenotypic tests in combination. We found the psaA-specific PCR to be the genotypic technique best suited for the identification of genuine pneumococci and optochin-resistant pneumococci.
机译:三种PCR技术( psaA ply lytA 基因的扩增)和商用试剂盒(AccuProbe [GenProbe,圣地亚哥,加利福尼亚州。 ],基于与16S rRNA基因的杂交),所有这四个据称对肺炎链球菌都具有特异性的细菌被用于鉴定49株疑似为肺炎球菌的α-溶血性链球菌。这些生物的明确表型鉴定为 S。当视光蛋白的敏感性和胶囊的存在作为标记时,肺炎很难发生。此外,对扩增的16S rRNA基因进行 Rsa I消化。所有49个菌株均对视光蛋白具有抗性。将其中的11种封装,并通过所有测试鉴定为肺炎球菌。在所有测试中,38个未封装的菌株中有20个被明确鉴定为非肺炎链球菌。由于所应用的所有表型和基因型技术的反应高度可变,另外18个未封装的菌株的身份仍然不确定。 AccuProbe测试对7个菌株呈阳性,而其他测试的结果尚无定论。扩增的16S rRNA基因的 Rsa I限制证实了所有菌株的AccuProbe结果,而 psaA 特异性PCR的结果与所有菌株的包封一致。此处给出的结果表明,尽管将基因型和表型测试结合使用,但某些菌株仍存在识别问题。我们发现 psaA 特异性PCR是最适合鉴定真正的肺炎链球菌和耐视光蛋白的肺炎球菌的基因型技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号