...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Interferon Gamma Release Assays for Diagnosis of Pleural Tuberculosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Interferon Gamma Release Assays for Diagnosis of Pleural Tuberculosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:干扰素γ释放测定对胸膜结核的诊断:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

The role of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs), although established for identifying latent tuberculosis, is still evolving in the diagnosis of active extrapulmonary tuberculosis. We systematically evaluated the diagnostic performance of blood- and pleural fluid-based IGRAs in tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE). We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for studies evaluating the use of commercially available IGRAs on blood and/or pleural fluid samples for diagnosing TPE. The quality of the studies included was assessed through the QUADAS-2 tool. The pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were generated using a bivariate random-effects model and examined using forest plots and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves. Indeterminate IGRA results were included for sensitivity calculations. Heterogeneity was explored through subgroup analysis and meta-regression based on prespecified covariates. We identified 19 studies assessing the T.SPOT.TB and/or QuantiFERON assays. There were 20 and 14 evaluations, respectively, of whole-blood and pleural fluid assays, involving 1,085 and 727 subjects, respectively. There was only one good-quality study, and five studies used nonstandard assay thresholds. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for the blood assays were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.83) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.76), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for the pleural fluid assays were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.84) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.87), respectively. There was considerable heterogeneity; however, multivariate meta-regression did not identify any covariate with significant influence. There was no publication bias for blood assays. We conclude that commercial IGRAs, performed either on whole-blood or pleural fluid samples, have poor diagnostic accuracy in patients suspected to have TPE.
机译:尽管已经建立了干扰素γ释放测定法(IGRA)的作用以鉴定潜伏性结核,但在活动性肺外结核的诊断中仍在发展。我们系统地评估了基于血液和胸水的IGRA在结核性胸腔积液(TPE)中的诊断性能。我们在PubMed和Embase数据库中进行了搜索,以研究评估在血液和/或胸水样本上使用市售IGRA进行TPE诊断的研究。通过QUADAS-2工具评估了纳入研究的质量。使用双变量随机效应模型生成具有95%置信区间(95%CI)的敏感性和特异性的汇总估计值,并使用森林图和分层汇总接收器操作特征(HSROC)曲线进行检查。不确定的IGRA结果包括在灵敏度计算中。通过亚组分析和基于预定协变量的Meta回归,探索了异质性。我们确定了19项评估T.SPOT.TB和/或QuantiFERON分析的研究。全血和胸水检测分别有20和14个评估,分别涉及1,085和727名受试者。只有一项优质研究,五项研究使用非标准测定阈值。血液检测的合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.77(95%CI,0.71至0.83)和0.71(95%CI,0.65至0.76)。胸膜液测定的合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.72(95%CI,0.55至0.84)和0.78(95%CI,0.65至0.87)。有很大的异质性。然而,多元荟萃回归未发现任何具有重大影响的协变量。血液检测没有偏倚。我们得出的结论是,对全血或胸水样本进行的商业IGRA对怀疑患有TPE的患者的诊断准确性较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号