...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic Medium for Recovery of Mycobacteria, Fungi, and Bacteria from Blood
【24h】

Evaluation of BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic Medium for Recovery of Mycobacteria, Fungi, and Bacteria from Blood

机译:评估BACTEC MYCO / F裂解液用于从血液中回收分枝杆菌,真菌和细菌的方法

获取原文
           

摘要

MYCO/F Lytic medium (MFL), a liquid medium developed for use with the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system, was compared to the Isolator system (IS) for the recovery of fungi and to the BACTEC 13A medium for the recovery of mycobacteria. Recovery of bacteria was compared to routine BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F (AF) blood cultures. Microbial growth was detected in 203 (17%) of 1,166 blood cultures. Fifty-seven specimens were positive for fungi: 35 were positive with both IS and MFL; six were positive with IS only (three Candida albicans, oneHistoplasma capsulatum, one Candida glabrata, and one Fusarium species isolate); three were positive with AF only (two C. albicans and one Candida parapsilosis isolate); and 13 were positive with MFL only (fiveC. glabrata, three C. albicans, twoCandida krusei, two Candida tropicalis, and oneC. parapsilosis isolate; P > 0.05 versus IS). Eighteen of 19 blood cultures positive for H. capsulatum grew in both IS and MFL, although the time to detection for MFL was greater. The mean time to detection for all fungi was 8.15 days for IS and 12.07 days for MFL. Seven hundred forty specimens were also cultured for mycobacteria with MFL and 13A. Forty-four grew mycobacteria; 38 were positive with both 13A and MFL; and 16 were positive with MFL only. Mycobacterium avium was recovered from 41 specimens; 36 were positive for both systems and 5 were positive for MFL alone. MFL was also compared to the AF bottle for the same 740 specimens. MFL and AF both detected 34 of the 40 clinically significant bacteria, while IS detected only 15 of 40. In summary, MFL is an excellent medium for the recovery of fungi, mycobacteria, and bacteria; however, the time to detection of H. capsulatum is increased.
机译:将MYCO / F Lytic培养基(MFL)(一种为与BACTEC 9240血液培养系统一起使用而开发的液体培养基)与用于回收真菌的隔离系统(IS)和与用于回收分枝杆菌的BACTEC 13A培养基进行了比较。将细菌的回收率与常规的BACTEC Plus有氧/ F(AF)血液培养进行了比较。在1,166个血液培养物中的203个(17%)中检测到微生物生长。 57份真菌标本为阳性:IS和MFL均为35份。 6例仅IS阳性(3例白色念珠菌,1例荚膜组织胞浆菌,1例光滑念珠菌和1例镰刀菌物种隔离); 3例仅AF阳性(2例白色念珠菌和1例ara> Candida parapsilsilosis )。和13例仅MFL阳性(5株短毛念珠菌,3株白色念珠菌,2株克鲁斯假丝酵母,2株热带假丝酵母< / em>和一个 C。parapsilosis 隔离株; P 鸟分枝杆菌。两个系统均为36阳性,单独MFL为5阳性。对于同样的740个标本,还将MFL与AF瓶进行了比较。 MFL和AF均检出了40种临床上重要的细菌中的34种,而IS仅检出了40种中的15种。总而言之,MFL是恢复真菌,分枝杆菌和细菌的极佳培养基。但是,检测 H的时间。荚膜增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号