...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Hepatitis C Virus RNA Quantitation in Venous and Capillary Small-Volume Whole-Blood Samples
【24h】

Hepatitis C Virus RNA Quantitation in Venous and Capillary Small-Volume Whole-Blood Samples

机译:静脉和毛细管小体积全血样品中的丙型肝炎病毒RNA定量

获取原文
           

摘要

Quantitation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in plasma and serum samples is a costly procedure in both time and reagents. Additionally, cell-associated viral RNA may not be detected. This study evaluated the accuracy of HCV RNA quantitation in small-volume whole-blood (WB) samples, which would be appropriate for point-of-care diagnostic devices. HCV RNA was extracted from 222 clinical plasma and WB samples of 82 patients with chronic hepatitis C by a specific locked nucleic acid-mediated capture method and quantified by real-time reverse transcription-PCR. The results were compared to the reference plasma viral load determined with the COBAS AmpliPrep/TaqMan (CAP/CTM) HCV test. This assay had an analytical sensitivity of 9 IU per 10-μl sample (95% limit of detection [95% LOD]), a linearity range of 500 to 5 × 106 IU/ml, and was accurate in testing 10 HCV subtypes (<0.22 log10 unit) in plasma. The assay was matrix equivalent for plasma and WB samples (coefficient of determination [R2] of 0.943) and had a specificity of 100% (n = 20) in WB samples. The HCV RNA concentration in clinical WB samples exceeded the estimated hematocrit-corrected plasma viral loads by 0.22 log10 unit, but absolute quantitation results in plasma and WB samples were identical (95% confidence interval, ?0.06 to 0.04 log10 unit). The sensitivity in WB samples was 100% (n = 141) for plasma concentrations above the 95% LOD. Quantitation results in 10-μl WB samples correlated linearly with the CAP/CTM HCV plasma test results (R2 = 0.919; n = 140) and did not differ between capillary and venous samples (R2 = 0.960; n = 40). This study shows that HCV RNA quantitation in 10-μl WB samples is appropriate for monitoring viral loads of >900 IU/ml, although the use of WB does not increase the diagnostic sensitivity.
机译:血浆和血清样品中丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)RNA的定量分析在时间和试剂上都是昂贵的过程。此外,可能无法检测到细胞相关的病毒RNA。这项研究评估了小体积全血(WB)样本中HCV RNA定量的准确性,该样本适用于即时诊断设备。通过特异性锁定核酸介导的捕获方法从82例慢性丙型肝炎患者的222个临床血浆和WB样本中提取HCV RNA,并通过实时逆转录PCR进行定量。将结果与通过COBAS AmpliPrep / TaqMan(CAP / CTM)HCV测试确定的参考血浆病毒载量进行比较。此测定的分析灵敏度为每10微升样品9 IU(检测限的95%[95%LOD]),线性范围为500至5×10 6 IU / ml,在血浆中检测10种HCV亚型(<0.22 log 10 单位)时准确。该测定对血浆和WB样品的基质当量(测定系数[ R 2 ]为0.943),特异性为100%( n = 20)在WB样本中。临床WB样品中的HCV RNA浓度超出了估计的经血细胞比容校正的血浆病毒载量0.22 log 10 单位,但血浆和WB样品中的绝对定量结果相同(95%置信区间,≤0.06 0.04 log 10 单位)。对于高于95%LOD的血浆浓度,WB样品的灵敏度为100%( n = 141)。 10μlWB样品中的定量结果与CAP / CTM HCV血浆检测结果呈线性相关( R 2 = 0.919; n = 140)并且毛细管样品和静脉样品之间没有差异( R 2 = 0.960; n = 40)。这项研究表明,在10μlWB样品中进行HCV RNA定量分析适合监测> 900 IU / ml的病毒载量,尽管使用WB并不能提高诊断的敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号