...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of BACTEC PLUS Blood Culture Media to BacT/Alert FA Blood Culture Media for Detection of Bacterial Pathogens in Samples Containing Therapeutic Levels of Antibiotics
【24h】

Comparison of BACTEC PLUS Blood Culture Media to BacT/Alert FA Blood Culture Media for Detection of Bacterial Pathogens in Samples Containing Therapeutic Levels of Antibiotics

机译:BACTEC PLUS血液培养基与BacT / Alert FA血液培养基用于检测含有抗生素治疗水平的细菌病原体的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Blood culture bottles with antimicrobial removal systems are recommended for patients who develop fever while on antibiotics. This study compared the ability of Becton Dickinson (Sparks, MD) BACTEC PLUS bottles and bioMerieux (Durham, NC) BacT/Alert FA bottles to effectively remove vancomycin, cefoxitin, ceftriaxone, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ampicillin, oxacillin, gentamicin, and a combination of gentamicin/penicillin, thus allowing bacterial pathogens to grow. Each bottle was spiked with 10 ml of human blood, antibiotic, and strains of organisms susceptible to the antibiotic evaluated. The organisms used were type strains and clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin susceptible and resistant), Streptococcus pneumoniae, a viridans streptococcus, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Streptococcus agalactiae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Testing was completed in triplicate, using 10 to 100 CFU/ml of organisms with various concentrations of each antibiotic. Two rounds of testing were completed per antibiotic/organism combination. Bottles were mixed and loaded onto their respective instruments as per the manufacturer's instructions. Antimicrobial removal was evaluated on the basis of time to detection of organism growth, for up to 5 days of incubation. Overall, the BacT/Alert FA system recovered 25.1% of strains from test bottles and 96.9% of strains from growth control bottles (no antibiotic added), and the BACTEC PLUS system recovered 95.1% of strains from test bottles and 100% of strains from growth control bottles. Both systems performed well in the detection of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the presence of gentamicin. In the presence of ceftriaxone, neither system was able to recover Streptococcus pneumoniae. The ability to remove vancomycin and cefoxitin was also determined by measuring antibiotic levels remaining in bottles after 1 h of incubation. The results demonstrated remaining levels of 72 to 90% of vancomycin and 71 to 72% of cefoxitin in the BacT/Alert system. For the BACTEC system, remaining levels were 0 to 30% of vancomycin and 0% of cefoxitin. Under these simulated conditions, the BACTEC PLUS system was superior to the BacT/Alert FA system in recovering gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial pathogens in the presence of β-lactam antibiotics, gentamicin/penicillin, and vancomycin.
机译:对于使用抗生素时发烧的患者,建议使用带有抗菌去除系统的血培养瓶。这项研究比较了Becton Dickinson(Sparks,MD)BACTEC PLUS瓶和bioMerieux(Durham,NC)BacT / Alert FA瓶有效去除万古霉素,头孢西丁,头孢曲松,头孢吡肟,哌拉西林-他唑巴坦,氨苄青霉素,奥沙西林和庆大霉素的能力庆大霉素/青霉素的组合,从而使细菌病原体生长。每个瓶子都加了10毫升人体血液,抗生素和对抗生素敏感的生物菌株。所使用的生物是金黄色葡萄球菌(易感和耐甲氧西林),肺炎链球菌,绿孢子链球菌,肠球菌的类型菌株和临床分离株, 粪肠球菌无乳链球菌大肠杆菌肺炎克雷伯菌铜绿假单胞菌。使用10至100 CFU / ml各种浓度的每种抗生素的生物,一式三份完成测试。每种抗生素/有机物组合均完成了两轮测试。按照制造商的说明将瓶子混合并装入各自的仪器中。根据检测生物生长的时间(最多孵育5天)评估抗菌素的去除情况。总体而言,BacT / Alert FA系统从测试瓶中回收了25.1%的菌株,从生长控制瓶(未添加抗生素)中回收了96.9%的菌株,而BACTEC PLUS系统从测试瓶中回收了95.1%的菌株,并从测试瓶中回收了100%的菌株。生长控制瓶。在庆大霉素存在下,两种系统在检测大肠埃希菌,肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌中均表现良好。在存在头孢曲松的情况下,这两个系统均无法恢复肺炎链球菌。还通过测量孵育1小时后瓶中残留的抗生素水平来确定去除万古霉素和头孢西丁的能力。结果表明,在BacT / Alert系统中,万古霉素和头孢西丁的残留量分别为72%至90%和71%至72%。对于BACTEC系统,剩余水平为万古霉素的0至30%和头孢西丁的0%。在这些模拟条件下,在存在β-内酰胺抗生素,庆大霉素/青霉素和万古霉素的情况下,BACTEC PLUS系统在回收革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性细菌病原体方面优于BacT / Alert FA系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号