...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Random amplified polymorphic DNA assay is less discriminant than pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
【24h】

Random amplified polymorphic DNA assay is less discriminant than pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

机译:对于耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的分型,随机扩增多态性DNA检测的判别力比脉冲场凝胶电泳的判别力小。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Twenty-six strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis fingerprints were tested by random amplified polymorphic DNA assay with three primers, resulting in 15 to 20 different random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprints. By summing the results for the three primers, the number of different fingerprints increased to 25, but two strains could not be differentiated. We conclude that pulsed-field gel electrophoresis remains the best method of typing methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains.
机译:通过使用三个引物的随机扩增多态性DNA检测,对26株具有不同脉冲场凝胶电泳指纹图谱的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌株进行了测试,结果产生了15至20种不同的随机扩增多态性DNA指纹图谱。通过将三种引物的结果相加,不同指纹的数量增加到25,但是无法区分两个菌株。我们得出结论,脉冲场凝胶电泳仍然是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌株分类的最佳方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号