...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison between O Serotyping Method and Multiplex Real-Time PCR To Identify Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in Taiwan
【24h】

Comparison between O Serotyping Method and Multiplex Real-Time PCR To Identify Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in Taiwan

机译:O血清分型方法与多重实时PCR鉴定台湾腹泻性大肠杆菌的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To compare the diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) identifications obtained between traditional O serotyping and modern virulence gene detection assays, we developed a multiplex real-time PCR assay by detecting six specific virulence genes for enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), and enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC). Among 261 clinical diarrheal stool samples, a total of 137 suspected DEC (sDEC) isolates were identified by the use of commercially available antisera. The most prevalent serogroups were O1 (12/137; 8.7%), O25 (9/137; 6.5%), and O44 (9/137; 6.5%). The specific virulence genes for the 137 sDEC isolates were analyzed by the multiplex real-time PCR assay. Fifteen (10.9%) of 137 isolates were confirmed to be true DEC strains, indicating that the serotypic markers did not correlate with the specific virulence genes. ETEC (66.7%) was the most prevalent, followed by EIEC (20%) and EPEC (13.3%). No EHEC strains were identified in the specimens. Four novel serotypes were found in the study: two in EPEC strains (O111:H9 and O63:H6) and two in EIEC strains (O63:H9 and O169:H9). In conclusion, the real-time PCR assay considerably reduces the high false-positive rate from the use of serotyping alone, and thus, it is suggested that serogrouping-based methods are inadequate for the identification of DEC isolates, although they are useful for the identification of a limited number of serogroups. In addition, ETEC, EPEC, and EIEC strains were present in 5.7% (15/261) of the diarrheal patients in northern Taiwan in 2006.
机译:为了比较传统O血清分型法和现代毒力基因检测方法之间的腹泻性大肠杆菌(DEC)鉴定,我们通过检测六个致肠病性 E特异性毒力基因,开发了一种多重实时PCR检测方法。大肠杆菌(EPEC),肠出血性 E。大肠杆菌(EHEC),产肠毒素的 E。大肠杆菌(ETEC)和肠侵袭性 E。大肠菌(EIEC)。在261例临床腹泻大便样本中,通过使用市售抗血清鉴定出总共137个可疑DEC(sDEC)分离株。最普遍的血清群是O1(12/137; 8.7%),O25(9/137; 6.5%)和O44(9/137; 6.5%)。通过多重实时PCR测定法分析了137个sDEC分离株的特异性毒力基因。 137个分离株中有15个(10.9%)被确认是真正的DEC菌株,表明血清型标记与特定的毒力基因不相关。 ETEC(66.7%)是最流行的,其次是EIEC(20%)和EPEC(13.3%)。在标本中未鉴定出EHEC菌株。在研究中发现了四种新型血清型:两种是EPEC菌株(O111:H9和O63:H6),另外两种是EIEC菌株(O63:H9和O169:H9)。总而言之,实时PCR检测法大大降低了仅使用血清分型法产生的假阳性率,因此,建议基于血清组的方法不足以鉴定DEC分离株,尽管它们可用于分离。鉴定数量有限的血清群。此外,2006年台湾北部腹泻患者中有5.7%(15/261)存在ETEC,EPEC和EIEC菌株。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号