...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of a Microculture Method for Isolation of Leishmania Parasites from Cutaneous Lesions of Patients in Peru
【24h】

Evaluation of a Microculture Method for Isolation of Leishmania Parasites from Cutaneous Lesions of Patients in Peru

机译:从秘鲁患者皮损中分离利什曼原虫的微培养方法的评价

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Traditional culture of Leishmania spp. is labor intensive and has poor sensitivity. We evaluated a microculture method for the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in consecutive patients presenting to the Leishmaniasis Clinic at the Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Peru, for evaluation of skin lesions. Lesion aspirates were cultured in duplicate and parallel in traditional culture tubes containing modified Novy-MacNeal-Nicolle (NNN) medium or Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum (10% RPMI) and in 70-μl capillary tubes containing a mixture of lesion aspirate and 10% RPMI. For sensitivity analysis, the consensus standard was considered to be a positive result in any two of the following four tests: Giemsa-stained lesion smear, culture, kinetoplast DNA PCR, or leishmanin skin test. The outcome measures were sensitivity and time to culture positivity. Forty-five patients with 62 skin lesions were enrolled in the study, of which 53 lesions fulfilled the consensus criteria for a final diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Of these 53 lesions, 39 were culture positive: 38 in capillary tubes, 29 in traditional culture tubes with modified NNN medium, and 19 in traditional culture tubes with 10% RPMI medium. The sensitivity of microculture was 71.7%, versus 54.7% for traditional culture with NNN (P, 0.038) and 35.8% with 10% RPMI (P, <0.001). The mean times to culture positivity were 4.2 days by microculture, 5.2 days in NNN, and 6 days in 10% RPMI (P, 0.009). We have demonstrated that microculture is a more sensitive and time-efficient means of isolating Leishmania parasites from cutaneous lesions than traditional culture.
机译:利什曼原虫的传统文化。劳动强度大,敏感性差。我们评估了在秘鲁热带医学院亚历山大·冯·洪堡研究所就诊于利什曼病诊所的连续患者中诊断皮肤利什曼病的微培养方法,以评估皮肤损伤。将病变吸出物在含有改良的Novy-MacNeal-Nicolle(NNN)培养基或Roswell Park Memorial Institute培养基1640,含有10%胎牛血清(10%RPMI)的传统培养管中和含有10%胎牛血清的70μl毛细管中一式两份平行培养。病灶抽吸物和10%RPMI的混合物。对于敏感性分析,在以下四个测试中的两个测试中,共识标准被认为是阳性结果:Giemsa染色的病灶涂片,培养,动塑料DNA PCR或利什曼宁皮肤测试。结果指标是敏感性和培养阳性时间。该研究招募了45名62个皮肤病灶的患者,其中53个病灶符合皮肤利什曼病的最终诊断的共识标准。在这53个病变中,有39个呈阳性培养:在毛细管中为38个,在具有改良NNN培养基的传统培养管中为29个,在具有10%RPMI培养基的传统培养管中为19个。微培养的敏感性为71.7%,而使用NNN的传统培养的敏感性为54.7%( P ,0.038),使用10%RPMI的敏感性为35.8%( P ,<0.001)。通过微培养,培养阳性的平均时间为4.2天,在NNN中为5.2天,在10%RPMI中为6天( P ,0.009)。我们已经证明,与传统培养相比,微培养是一种从皮肤病变中分离利什曼原虫寄生虫的灵敏且省时的方法。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号