...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Serological Detection Methods for Diagnosis of Ehrlichia canis Infections in Dogs
【24h】

Comparison of Serological Detection Methods for Diagnosis of Ehrlichia canis Infections in Dogs

机译:血清学检测方法诊断犬埃里希氏菌感染的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

We determined the value of four serological assays for the diagnosis of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis by comparing them to the indirect fluorescent-antibody assay “gold standard.” The specificity of Dip-S-Ticks was significantly lower than that of all of the other tests evaluated. The sensitivity of Dip-S-Ticks was significantly higher than that of Snap3Dx or the Snap Canine Combo. The sensitivity of the rMAP2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was significantly higher than that of the Snap Canine Combo. The accuracy levels of the rMAP2 ELISA, Snap3Dx, Dip-S-Ticks, and Snap Canine Combo were 97.0, 89.8, 85.1, and 82.9%, respectively.
机译:通过将四种血清学检测与间接荧光抗体检测“金标准”进行比较,我们确定了四种血清学检测对犬单核细胞埃希氏菌病的诊断价值。 Dip-S-Ticks的特异性显着低于所有其他评估的测试。 Dip-S-Ticks的灵敏度显着高于Snap3Dx或Snap Canine Combo。 rMAP2酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的灵敏度显着高于Snap Canine Combo的灵敏度。 rMAP2 ELISA,Snap3Dx,Dip-S-Ticks和Snap Canine Combo的准确度分别为97.0%,89.8、85.1和82.9%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号