...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Clinical Evaluation of Two Methods for Genotyping Hepatitis C Virus Based on Analysis of the 5′ Noncoding Region
【24h】

Clinical Evaluation of Two Methods for Genotyping Hepatitis C Virus Based on Analysis of the 5′ Noncoding Region

机译:基于5′非编码区分析的两种丙型肝炎病毒基因分型方法的临床评价

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We compared the performance characteristics of a standardized direct sequencing method (TRUGENE HCV 5′NC; Visible Genetics Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and a reverse hybridization line probe assay (INNO-LiPA HCV II; Bayer Corp., Tarrytown, N.Y.) for genotyping of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Both methods are based on detection of sequence heterogeneity in the 5′ noncoding (5′NC) region. Concordance between the genotyping methods was assessed by testing 172 samples representing the six major genotypes. Sequence analysis of the more phylogenetically informative nonstructural 5B (NS5B) region was also done with 148 (86%) samples to confirm the accuracy of and resolve discrepancies between the 5′NC genotyping results. The sensitivities of the methods were assessed by using the 5′NC amplicon from both the qualitative and quantitative AMPLICOR HCV tests (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, Ind.). The ability of the methods to detect mixed-genotype infections was determined with mixtures of two different genotypes at relative concentrations ranging from 1 to 50%. Both 5′NC methods were able to genotype 99.4% of the samples with type agreement for 99.5% and subtype agreement for 68.2% of the samples. No or ambiguous subtype results were found by the line probe assay for 16.5% and by the TRUGENE 5′NC test for 17.1% of the samples. Discrepancies occurred between the line probe assay and NS5B results at the type level for 1.4% of the samples and at the subtype level for 14.2% of the samples. Discrepancies also occurred between the TRUGENE 5′NC and NS5B results at the type level for 2% of the samples and at the subtype level for 8.1% of the samples. We also found two distinct strains of HCV classified as type 2 by analysis of the 5′NC region that were type 1 by analysis of the NS5B region. The sensitivities of the two 5′NC genotyping methods were comparable and dependent on the amplification test used (~103 IU/ml with the qualitative HCV RNA tests and ~105 IU/ml with the quantitative HCV RNA tests). Genotype mixtures were successfully identified at a relative concentration of 5% by the line probe assay and 10% by the TRUGENE 5′NC test. In conclusion, the performance characteristics of the 5′NC methods were similar and both methods produced accurate results at the genotype level but neither method should be used for subtyping.
机译:我们比较了标准直接测序方法(TRUGENE HCV 5'NC; Visible Genetics Inc.,多伦多,加拿大安大略省)和反向杂交线探针测定法(INNO-LiPA HCV II; Bayer Corp.,Tarrytown,NY)的性能特征。 )用于丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的基因分型。两种方法都基于5'非编码(5'NC)区域中序列异质性的检测。通过测试代表六种主要基因型的172个样品,评估了基因分型方法之间的一致性。还对148个样本(86%)进行了系统发育信息更丰富的非结构性5B(NS5B)区域的序列分析,以确认5'NC基因分型结果的准确性并解决其中的差异。通过定性和定量AMPLICOR HCV测试(Roche Diagnostics Corp.,印第安纳波利斯,印第安纳州)中的5'NC扩增子评估方法的敏感性。该方法检测混合基因型感染的能力由两种不同基因型的混合物(相对浓度为1%至50%)确定。两种5'NC方法均能对99.4%的样本进行基因分型,其中类型一致性为99.5%,亚型一致性为68.2%。通过线探针分析未发现或含糊的亚型结果占16.5%,通过TRUGENE 5'NC测试未发现有17.1%的样品。线探针测定法和NS5B结果之间的差异在类型水平的样本中占1.4%,在亚型水平的样本中占14.2%。在TRUGENE 5'NC和NS5B结果之间,在2%样品的类型水平和8.1%样品的亚型水平之间也存在差异。通过分析5'NC区域,我们还发现了两种类型分别为2型的HCV,通过分析NS5B区域,它们为1型。两种5'NC基因分型方法的敏感性相当,并且取决于所用的扩增试验(定性HCV RNA试验约为10 3 IU / ml和〜10 5 IU / ml的HCV RNA定量检测)。通过线性探针测定法成功鉴定出相对浓度为5%的基因型混合物,通过TRUGENE 5'NC试验成功鉴定出相对浓度为10%的基因型混合物。总之,5'NC方法的性能特征相似,并且两种方法均在基因型水平上产生了准确的结果,但两种方法都不可用于亚型分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号