...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Controlled Clinical Comparison of BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F to Standard Anaerobic/F as the Anaerobic Companion Bottle to Plus Aerobic/F Medium for Culturing Blood from Adults
【24h】

Controlled Clinical Comparison of BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F to Standard Anaerobic/F as the Anaerobic Companion Bottle to Plus Aerobic/F Medium for Culturing Blood from Adults

机译:BACTEC Plus厌氧/ F与标准厌氧/ F作为成人厌氧培养瓶厌氧/ F有氧/ F培养基的对照临床比较

获取原文
           

摘要

To determine the optimal anaerobic companion bottle to pair with BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F medium for recovery of pathogenic microorganisms from adult patients with bacteremia and fungemia, we compared Plus Anaerobic/F bottles with Standard Anaerobic/F bottles, each of which was filled with 4 to 6 ml of blood. The two bottles were paired with a Plus Aerobic/F bottle filled with 8 to 12 ml of blood. A total of 14,011 blood culture sets were obtained. Of these, 11,583 sets were received with all three bottles filled adequately and 12,257 were received with both anaerobic bottles filled adequately. Of 818 clinically important isolates detected in one or both adequately filled anaerobic bottles, significantly more staphylococci (P< 0.001), streptococci (P < 0.005),Escherichia coli isolates (P < 0.02),Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (P < 0.005), and all microorganisms combined (P < 0.001) were detected in Plus Anaerobic/F bottles. In contrast, significantly more anaerobic gram-negative bacilli were detected in Standard Anaerobic/F bottles (P < 0.05). Of 397 unimicrobial episodes of septicemia, 354 were detected with both pairs, 30 were detected with Plus Aerobic/F–Plus Anaerobic/F pairs only, and 13 were detected with Plus Aerobic/F–Standard Anaerobic/F pairs only (P < 0.05). Significantly more episodes of bacteremia caused by members of the family Enterobacteriaceae(P < 0.05) and aerobic and facultative gram-positive bacteria (P < 0.025) were detected with Plus Anaerobic/F bottles only. In a paired-bottle analysis, 810 of 950 isolates were recovered from both pairs, 90 were recovered from Plus Aerobic/F–Plus Anaerobic/F pairs only, and 50 were recovered from Plus Aerobic/F–Standard Anaerobic/F pairs only (P < 0.001). Paired Plus Aerobic/F–Plus Anaerobic/F bottles yielded significantly more staphylococci (P < 0.001), streptococci (P < 0.05), and members of the familyEnterobacteriaceae (P <0.001). We conclude that Plus Anaerobic/F bottles detect more microorganisms and episodes of bacteremia and fungemia than Standard Anaerobic/F bottles as companion bottles to Plus Aerobic/F bottles in the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system.
机译:为了确定与BACTEC Plus好氧/ F培养基配对以从成年菌血症和真菌病患者中回收病原微生物的最佳厌氧伴侣瓶,我们将Plus厌氧/ F瓶与标准厌氧/ F瓶进行了比较,每只装满4到6毫升血液。将两个瓶子与装有8至12毫升血液的Plus Aerobic / F瓶子配对。总共获得了14011个血液培养集。其中,共收到11583套,三个瓶子都装满了,收到了12257套两个厌氧瓶。在一个或两个装满的厌氧瓶中检出的818个临床上重要的分离株中,葡萄球菌( P <0.001),链球菌( P <0.005),大肠杆菌的数量明显增加分离株( P <0.02),肺炎克雷伯菌分离株( P <0.005)和所有微生物合并( P <0.001)在Plus厌氧/ F瓶中检测到。相比之下,在标准厌氧/ F瓶中检出的厌氧革兰氏阴性菌明显更多( P <0.05)。在397次单菌败血症发作中,两对均检测到354次,仅使用Plus Aerobic / F-Plus厌氧/ F对检测到30次,仅使用Plus Aerobic / F-标准厌氧/ F对检测到13次( P <0.05)。 肠杆菌科 P <0.05)和好氧兼兼性革兰氏阳性菌( P <0.025)引起的菌血症显着增加)仅使用Plus厌氧/ F瓶检测到。在配对瓶分析中,从两对中回收了950个分离株中的810个,仅从Plus Aerobic / F–Plus厌氧/ F对中回收了90个,仅从Plus Aerobic / F–标准厌氧/ F对中回收了50个( P <0.001)。配对Plus好氧/ F–Plus厌氧/ F瓶产生的葡萄球菌( P <0.001),链球菌( P <0.05)和家族成员肠杆菌科( P <0.001)。我们得出结论,与BACTEC 9240血液培养系统中Plus厌氧/ F瓶作为伴侣瓶相比,Plus厌氧/ F瓶检测到的微生物和菌血症和真菌病发作要多于标准厌氧/ F瓶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号