...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine samples by nucleic acid tests: comparison with culture and enzyme immunoassay of genital swab specimens.
【24h】

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine samples by nucleic acid tests: comparison with culture and enzyme immunoassay of genital swab specimens.

机译:通过核酸检测法检测尿样中的沙眼衣原体:与生殖器拭子标本的培养和酶免疫法比较。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Two commercially available nucleic acid-based tests, ligase chain reaction (LCR; Abbott Laboratories) and PCR (Roche Diagnostics), for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in male and female urine samples were compared with culture and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Microtrak; Syva) for C. trachomatis detection in genital samples. The samples were collected from 1,005 patients who attended a sexually transmitted disease clinic. In this study population, the prevalence of the infection was 4%. Specimens which were reactive in any of the tests were retested with a different PCR test using primers directed against the major outer membrane protein gene. With a "gold standard" of a positive culture, or any other positive test result if it was confirmed by an independent test, the Roche PCR (95% sensitive, 99.9% specific) was more sensitive than the LCR (75% sensitive, 100% specific) (chi2, P < 0.0001) while both tests were more sensitive than culture (58% sensitive, 100% specific) or EIA (45% sensitive, 100% specific) (chi2, P < 0.001). The Roche PCR and Abbott LCR tests of urine identified 65% and 30% more positive patients, respectively, than did testing by culture of urethral or cervical specimens. Nucleic acid testing of urine specimens for C. trachomatis is a more sensitive and convenient method for the detection of genital infection.
机译:将两种用于检测男性和女性尿样中的沙眼衣原体的商业化的基于核酸的测试,即连接酶链反应(LCR; Abbott实验室)和PCR(Roche Diagnostics)与培养和酶联免疫测定(EIA)(Microtrak; Syva)用于生殖器样本中的沙眼衣原体检测。样本是从参加性传播疾病诊所的1,005名患者中收集的。在该研究人群中,感染的患病率为4%。使用针对主要外膜蛋白基因的引物,通过不同的PCR测试对在任何测试中具有反应性的样品进行重新测试。如果采用阳性培养的“金标准”或其他任何阳性测试结果(如果通过独立测试确认),则罗氏PCR(95%敏感,99.9%特异性)比LCR(75%敏感,100敏感) %特异性)(chi2,P <0.0001),而两项测试均比培养(敏感性58%,100%特异性)或EIA(45%敏感性,100%特异性)(chi2,P <0.001)敏感。与尿道或宫颈标本培养相比,尿液的罗氏PCR和雅培LCR检测分别确定阳性患者多65%和30%。尿标本中的沙眼衣原体的核酸检测是检测生殖器感染的一种更灵敏,方便的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号