...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of hepatitis B virus DNA extractions from serum by the QIAamp blood kit, GeneReleaser, and the phenol-chloroform method.
【24h】

Comparison of hepatitis B virus DNA extractions from serum by the QIAamp blood kit, GeneReleaser, and the phenol-chloroform method.

机译:QIAamp血液试剂盒,GeneReleaser和苯酚-氯仿方法从血清中提取乙型肝炎病毒DNA的比较。

获取原文
           

摘要

The abilities of GeneReleaser and QIAamp to extract the hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA template from serum for amplification by PCR were evaluated and compared with that of the standard phenol-chloroform method. Differences in the sensitivities of the three methods were revealed by nested PCR of HBV DNA extracted from serially diluted hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive (high-titer) serum. Phenol-chloroform was found to be the most sensitive extraction method but was time-consuming and labor intensive, and the many steps required increased the possibility of contamination. In a titration of HBeAg-negative (low-titer) serum, all three methods coupled with nested PCR were capable of detecting low levels of HBV DNA. In the case of QIAamp and GeneReleaser, the extraction was relatively simple and rapid. The higher quantity of serum (200 microliters) used in the QIAamp extraction did not provide higher sensitivity, possibly because of incomplete removal of Taq polymerase inhibitors from the serum or inadequate disruption of the virion. GeneReleaser was more efficient because it gave the same detection limit in low-titer serum as phenol-chloroform even though it utilizes only 5 microliters of serum. However, it did not produce consistent amplifications of HBV DNA, giving false-negative results in 7 of the 50 cases (14%) in one experiment. Use of a larger volume of serum and replicate extractions may overcome this problem. Advantages thus exist in each of the extraction methods, and these should be weighed against the disadvantages when deciding which extraction method is appropriate.
机译:评价了GeneReleaser和QIAamp从血清中提取乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)DNA模板以通过PCR扩增的能力,并将其与标准苯酚-氯仿方法进行了比较。巢式PCR从连续稀释的乙型肝炎e抗原(HBeAg)阳性(高滴度)血清中提取的HBV DNA揭示了三种方法的敏感性差异。人们发现,苯酚-氯仿是最灵敏的提取方法,但既费时又费力,而且所需的许多步骤增加了污染的可能性。在滴定HBeAg阴性(低滴度)血清时,所有三种方法结合巢式PCR均可检测低水平的HBV DNA。对于QIAamp和GeneReleaser,提取相对简单且快速。 QIAamp提取中使用的大量血清(200微升)不能提供更高的灵敏度,这可能是由于Taq聚合酶抑制剂从血清中去除不完全或病毒体破坏不充分所致。 GeneReleaser效率更高,因为即使在仅使用5微升血清的情况下,它在低滴度血清中的检测限与苯酚-氯仿相同。但是,它不能产生一致的HBV DNA扩增,在一个实验中有50例中有7例(14%)得到假阴性结果。使用较大体积的血清和重复提取可以克服此问题。因此在每种提取方法中都存在优点,在确定哪种提取方法合适时应权衡这些缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号