...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of broth disk elution methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria with the newer beta-lactam antibiotics.
【24h】

Evaluation of broth disk elution methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria with the newer beta-lactam antibiotics.

机译:评价使用新型β-内酰胺类抗生素对厌氧菌进行药敏试验的肉汤圆盘洗脱方法。

获取原文
           

摘要

Broth disk elution procedures represent one of the most practical means for clinical laboratories to perform routine antibiotic susceptibility tests on anaerobic bacteria. The accuracy of five disk elution test methods and media (including the one to be proposed by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) was evaluated for the testing of newer beta-lactam antibiotics, including cefoperazone, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, ceftizoxime, moxalactam, and piperacillin. Various numbers of antibiotic disks were used to achieve disk elution test concentrations which approximated the highest MIC termed susceptible by the Food and Drug Administration. A group of 88 anaerobes representing many different species was tested in parallel by the five disk elution methods and the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference agar dilution procedure. Overall, full agreement between the reference agar dilution MICs and the disk elution category results was 88.3% for PRAS BHI, 84.5% for Schaedler, 85.7% for thioglycolate, and 87.4% for Wilkins-Chalgren broth. Essential agreement (+/- 1 twofold MIC increment from the disk elution concentration) was achieved with 94.6% of PRAS BHI tests, 94.3% of Schaedler tests, 93.6% of thioglycolate tests, and 95.7% of Wilkins-Chalgren tests. Due to growth failures with a number of isolates and difficulties in interpreting results, the use of Wilkins-West broth was discontinued after approximately one-half of the isolates had been tested. The majority of errors with all of the disk elution methods occurred with isolates (most notably members of the Bacteroides fragilis group) having MICs near the single test concentrations used in the disk methods. With the notable exception of tests for the B. fragilis group, the disk elution methods offered acceptable accuracy with the newer beta-lactam antibiotics tested in this study.
机译:肉汤圆盘洗脱程序代表临床实验室对厌氧菌进行常规抗生素敏感性测试的最实用手段之一。评估了五种盘洗脱测试方法和介质(包括由美国国家临床实验室标准委员会提议的一种)的准确性,以测试新型β-内酰胺类抗生素,包括头孢哌酮,头孢噻肟,头孢西丁,头孢他啶,头孢唑肟,莫拉西坦和哌拉西林。使用各种数量的抗生素圆盘来达到圆盘洗脱测试浓度,该浓度接近于由美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)认定的最高MIC。通过五种圆盘洗脱方法和美国国家临床实验室标准委员会琼脂稀释程序平行测试了一组代表许多不同物种的88种厌氧菌。总体而言,参比琼脂稀释MIC与圆盘洗脱类别结果的完全一致性为:PRAS BHI为88.3%,Schaedler为84.5%,巯基乙酸盐为85.7%,Wilkins-Chalgren肉汤为87.4%。通过94.6%的PRAS BHI测试,94.3%的Schaedler测试,93.6%的巯基乙酸盐测试和95.7%的Wilkins-Chalgren测试,实现了基本一致性(相对于磁盘洗脱浓度+/- 1倍的MIC增量)。由于许多分离株的生长失败,并且难以解释结果,因此,在测试了大约一半的分离株后,停止使用Wilkins-West肉汤。所有圆盘洗脱方法的大多数错误均发生在分离度(最明显的是脆弱拟杆菌的成员)中,其分离度(MICs)接近于圆盘方法所用的单一测试浓度。除了对脆弱类芽孢杆菌组的测试而言,圆盘洗脱方法对于本研究中测试的新型β-内酰胺类抗生素提供了可接受的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号