...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of five tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus from clinical samples.
【24h】

Comparison of five tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus from clinical samples.

机译:从临床样本中鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌的五种测试方法的比较。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Five different laboratory tests for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus were compared. Analyses of 271 presumptive S. aureus strains, supplemented with 59 well-defined methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates, were performed. Only the Staphaurex Plus (Murex Diagnostics, Dartford, United Kingdom) and the Pastorex Staphplus (Sanofi, Marnes-La-Coquette, France) tests displayed 100% sensitivity. The observed difference with the free-coagulase test (Bacto coagulase plasma; Difco, Detroit, Mich.), a bound-coagulase (clumping factor) test, and the former Staphaurex test (Murex Diagnostics) was caused mainly by the inability of these three tests to identify some MRSA strains correctly. Among Polish MRSA isolates included in the analysis, a group of free-coagulase-negative S. aureus strains was detected. Genetic typing by random amplification of polymorphic DNA revealed that the strains showing aberrant behavior when the different test results were compared belonged to limited number of S. aureus clones.
机译:比较了鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌的五个不同的实验室测试。分析了271种假定的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株,并补充了59种明确定义的耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)分离株。仅Staphaurex Plus(英国达特福德的Murex Diagnostics)和Pastorex Staphplus(法国Marnes-La-Coquette的Sanofi)测试显示出100%的灵敏度。与游离凝血酶测试(巴克托凝血酶血浆; Difco,底特律,密歇根州),结合凝血酶(凝集因子)测试和以前的Staphaurex测试(Murex Diagnostics)所观察到的差异主要是由于这三者均无法使用测试以正确识别某些MRSA菌株。分析中包括的波兰MRSA分离株中,检测到一组自由凝固酶阴性的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株。通过随机扩增多态性DNA进行的基因分型显示,当比较不同的测试结果时,表现出异常行为的菌株属于有限数量的金黄色葡萄球菌克隆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号