...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of plasmid- and chromosome-based polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids.
【24h】

Comparison of plasmid- and chromosome-based polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids.

机译:用于检测沙眼衣原体核酸的基于质粒和基于染色体的聚合酶链反应分析方法的比较。

获取原文
           

摘要

Several laboratories have demonstrated that the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is more sensitive than culture or enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary tract specimens when various DNA targets are used for amplification, including the cryptic plasmid, major outer membrane protein (MOMP), or rRNA genes. We compared the performances of five different PCR assays, including assays with two plasmid, two MOMP, and one rRNA targets, by amplifying serial dilutions of C. trachomatis DNA and testing genitourinary tract specimens. By using published procedures, two different plasmid primers had sensitivities of 0.1 fg for C. trachomatis plasmid DNA and 10 fg for total cellular DNA. The sensitivities of the assays with the two MOMP primers were 0.1 and 10 pg, and the sensitivity for the assay with the rRNA primers was 1 pg for cellular DNA. Both plasmid-based assays detected 38 of 38 confirmed Chlamydiazyme-positive specimens, whereas the assays with the MOMP and rRNA primers detected 36 of 38 and 29 of 38 confirmed Chlamydiazyme-positive specimens, respectively. Six of 18 Chlamydiazyme-negative specimens collected from individuals whose specimens were positive by culture or immunofluorescence were positive by both plasmid-based PCRs; 4 of these were positive by PCR with the MOMP primers and 3 were positive by PCR with the rRNA primers. The results obtained with both purified DNA and genitourinary tract specimens indicated that the plasmid-based PCRs are more sensitive than bacterial chromosome-based PCRs for detecting C. trachomatis.
机译:一些实验室已经证明,当使用各种DNA靶标进行扩增时,聚合酶链反应(PCR)对检测泌尿生殖道标本中的沙眼衣原体的敏感性要高于培养物或酶免疫法(EIA)(包括隐性质粒,主要外膜蛋白( MOMP)或rRNA基因。我们通过扩增沙眼衣原体DNA的系列稀释液和检测泌尿生殖道标本,比较了五种不同PCR分析的性能,包括使用两种质粒,两种MOMP和一种rRNA靶的分析。通过使用公开的程序,两种不同的质粒引物对沙眼衣原体质粒DNA的敏感性为0.1 fg,对总细胞DNA的敏感性为10 fg。用两种MOMP引物进行测定的灵敏度分别为0.1和10 pg,而使用rRNA引物进行测定的灵敏度对于细胞DNA则为1 pg。两种基于质粒的检测均检测到38个确诊的衣原体阳性标本,而使用MOMP和rRNA引物的检测法分别检测到38个确诊的衣原体阳性标本中的36个和29个。从通过培养或免疫荧光检测为阳性的个体收集的18种衣原体酶阴性样品中,有6个通过基于质粒的PCR均为阳性;其中的4个通过MOMP引物进行PCR阳性,而3个通过rRNA引物进行PCR阳性。用纯化的DNA和泌尿生殖道标本获得的结果表明,基于质粒的PCR比基于细菌染色体的PCR对沙眼衣原体的检测更为敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号