...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Evaluation of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose broth for recovery of Clostridium difficile from environmental sites.
【24h】

Evaluation of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose broth for recovery of Clostridium difficile from environmental sites.

机译:评价环丝氨酸-头孢西丁-果糖琼脂和环丝氨酸-头孢西丁-果糖肉汤从环境部位回收艰难梭菌的方法。

获取原文
           

摘要

Cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA) and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose broth (CCFB) containing either 500 or 250 micrograms of cycloserine per ml were compared for efficacy in the isolation of Clostridium difficile from hospital ward environmental sites. A RODAC imprint technique was used to inoculate prereduced CCFA. Moistened swabs were used to inoculate prereduced CCFB from environmental sites immediately adjacent to the RODAC sample sites. CCFA (6% positive) was significantly more sensitive than CCFB (3% positive; P less than 0.005), regardless of the cycloserine concentration. When the CCFA cycloserine concentration was decreased from 500 to 250 micrograms/ml, the overall rate of positive cultures rose from 4 to 17%. Medium containing 500 micrograms of cycloserine per ml may be too inhibitory to isolate many moderately sensitive strains of C. difficile from environmental sites. Regardless of the cycloserine concentration, the CCFA RODAC imprint technique is superior to the CCFB method.
机译:比较了每毫升含有500或250微克环丝氨酸的环丝氨酸-头孢西丁-果糖琼脂(CCFA)和环丝氨酸-头孢西丁-果糖肉汤(CCFB)从医院病房环境场所分离艰难梭菌的功效。使用RODAC压印技术接种预先还原的CCFA。潮湿的棉签用于从紧邻RODAC样品位置的环境位置接种预先还原的CCFB。不管环丝氨酸浓度如何,CCFA(阳性率为6%)比CCFB(阳性率为3%; P小于0.005)明显更高。当CCFA环丝氨酸浓度从500微克/毫升降低到250微克/毫升时,阳性培养物的总体比例从4%上升到17%。每毫升含500微克环丝氨酸的培养基可能抑制性太强,无法从环境部位分离出许多中等敏感的艰难梭菌菌株。不管环丝氨酸浓度如何,CCFA RODAC压印技术都优于CCFB方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号