...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of the Clearview Chlamydia test, Chlamydiazyme, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with a low prevalence of infection.
【24h】

Comparison of the Clearview Chlamydia test, Chlamydiazyme, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with a low prevalence of infection.

机译:比较Clearview衣原体试验,衣原体酶和细胞培养物检测感染率低的女性沙眼衣原体的情况。

获取原文
           

摘要

Two antigen detection systems, Clearview Chlamydia (Unipath Ltd., Bedford, United Kingdom) and Chlamydiazyme (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.), were compared with culture for the diagnosis of chlamydia infection in women attending gynecological clinics. Chlamydia trachomatis was isolated from 43 (4.5%) of the 965 women tested. In comparison with tissue culture, the Clearview Chlamydia and Chlamydiazyme tests had sensitivities of 79.0 and 74.4%, respectively, and both had a specificity of 99.6%. The results show that the Clearview Chlamydia test is comparable to Chlamydiazyme for the detection of C. trachomatis from endocervical specimens in a population with a low prevalence of infection.
机译:比较了两种抗原检测系统,Clearview衣原体(英国贝德福德的Unipath公司)和衣原体酶(伊利诺伊州北芝加哥的艾伯特实验室),将其与培养妇科门诊妇女的衣原体感染进行了比较。沙眼衣原体是从测试的965名妇女中的43名(4.5%)中分离出来的。与组织培养相比,Clearview衣原体和衣原体酶检测的敏感性分别为79.0%和74.4%,两者的特异性均为99.6%。结果表明,在感染率低的人群中,Clearview衣原体检测与衣原体酶可用于检测宫颈内标本中的沙眼衣原体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号