...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Disk diffusion test interpretive criteria and quality control recommendations for testing linezolid (U-100766) and eperezolid (U-100592) with commercially prepared reagents.
【24h】

Disk diffusion test interpretive criteria and quality control recommendations for testing linezolid (U-100766) and eperezolid (U-100592) with commercially prepared reagents.

机译:使用市售试剂测试利奈唑胺(U-100766)和依哌利唑(U-100592)的圆盘扩散测试解释标准和质量控制建议。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Two new oxazolidinones were tested to determine interpretive susceptibility testing criteria for MIC and disk diffusion methods. Commercial lots of linezolid (formerly U-100766) and eperezolid (formerly U-100592) disks containing 30 microg of drug were tested against 728 isolates of bacteria with defined mechanisms of resistance. Results from linezolid were highlighted because of its choice for clinical development. By using preliminary pharmacokinetic data, a tentative susceptibility breakpoint of < or = 4 microg/ml was selected. Corresponding breakpoint zone diameters for linezolid were > or = 21 mm (< or = 4 microg/ml) for susceptibility and < or = 17 mm (> or = 16 microg/ml) for resistance. Regression statistics demonstrated a high correlation coefficient (r > or = 0.98), and absolute categorical agreement between methods was obtained, when staphylococci and enterococci were tested with the cited criteria. When Streptococcus spp. (including S. pneumoniae) were tested, only the susceptibility breakpoint was suggested. Quality control (QC) guidelines for linezolid disk diffusion tests were established by a multilaboratory trial as follows: 27 to 31 mm for Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and 28 to 34 mm for S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619. More than 95% of all QC results were within these proposed ranges. Although not advanced to clinical trials, eperezolid demonstrated potency comparable to that of linezolid and had identical interpretive testing criteria. These preliminary interpretive criteria and QC limits (accepted by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) should be applied to linezolid tests during the clinical-trial phases of oxazolidinone drug development in order to ensure test accuracy and reproducibility.
机译:测试了两种新的恶唑烷酮,以确定MIC和磁盘扩散方法的解释敏感性测试标准。测试了含有30微克药物的商品批次利奈唑胺(以前的U-100766)和依哌利唑(以前的U-100592)盘对728株具有明确耐药机制的细菌的分离度。由于利奈唑胺可用于临床开发,因此突出了其结果。通过使用初步的药代动力学数据,选择了小于或等于4 microg / ml的暂定敏感性断点。利奈唑胺的相应断点区直径敏感性为>或= 21 mm(<或= 4 microg / ml),抗性为<或= 17 mm(>或= 16 microg / ml)。回归统计数据表明,当用引用的标准测试葡萄球菌和肠球菌时,方法之间具有绝对相关性(r>或= 0.98),并且在方法之间获得了绝对的绝对一致性。当链球菌属。 (包括肺炎链球菌)进行了测试,仅建议了敏感性断点。通过多实验室试验建立了利奈唑胺片扩散试验的质量控制(QC)准则,如下所述:金黄色葡萄球菌ATCC 25923为27至31 mm,肺炎链球菌ATCC 49619为28至34 mm。所有QC结果中的95%以上在建议的范围内。尽管尚未进入临床试验,但依哌唑胺仍具有与利奈唑胺相当的功效,并具有相同的解释性测试标准。这些初步的解释性标准和QC限值(国家临床实验室标准委员会接受)应在恶唑烷酮药物开发的临床试验阶段应用于利奈唑胺试验,以确保试验的准确性和可重复性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号