...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae by using the E-test.
【24h】

Quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae by using the E-test.

机译:使用E检验对流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎链球菌进行定量药敏试验。

获取原文
           

摘要

The E-test (PDM Epsilometer; AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) is an antimicrobial agent gradient-coated plastic test strip which allows MIC determinations on agar media. The test is performed in a manner similar to the agar disk diffusion procedure. A collection of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae strains possessing various resistance mechanisms was used to evaluate the E-test method. H. influenzae strains were tested with both Haemophilus test medium (HTM) and PDM ASM II chocolate agar, while the S. pneumoniae strains were tested on Mueller-Hinton sheep blood agar. E-test MICs for a total of 10 antimicrobial agents were compared with broth microdilution MICs determined according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards methods. In general, E-test MICs for both species were quickly and easily interpreted and agreed within one log2 MIC increment in 89.8% of tests with H. influenzae and in 80.4% of pneumococcal tests. The majority of disagreements between the E-test and conventional MICs occurred with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole because of trailing and diffuse E-test MIC endpoints with both species. Ampicillin MICs for beta-lactamase-producing H. influenzae determined by the E-test differed at times from those determined by conventional testing because of the vagaries of interpreting colonies growing within the E-test inhibition ellipses. E-test penicillin MICs for pneumococci tended to be 1 to 2 log2 dilutions lower than those determined by using Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with lysed horse blood. Nevertheless, strains of both species with documented resistance to the study drugs were detected by E-tests, i.e., 0.7% of the tests had very major errors with H. influenzae and 0.8% had very major errors with S. pneumoniae. Thus, the E-test represents a potential alternative method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of these two fastidious bacterial species.
机译:E-test(PDM Epsilometer; AB Biodisk,Solna,瑞典)是一种抗微生物剂梯度涂层塑料测试条,可用于在琼脂培养基上测定MIC。以类似于琼脂盘扩散程序的方式进行测试。使用具有各种抗性机制的流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎链球菌菌株的集合来评估E-检验方法。流感嗜血杆菌菌株用嗜血杆菌测试培养基(HTM)和PDM ASM II巧克力琼脂进行了测试,而肺炎链球菌菌株则在Mueller-Hinton绵羊血琼脂上进行了测试。将针对总共10种抗菌剂的E-test MIC与根据国家临床实验室标准委员会方法确定的肉汤微稀释MIC进行了比较。总的来说,对这两个物种的E-test MIC都可以快速,轻松地解释并在流感嗜血杆菌检测的89.8%和肺炎球菌检测的80.4%范围内以1 log2 MIC的增加达成一致。 E-检验和常规MIC的大多数分歧都发生在甲氧苄氨嘧啶-磺胺甲基恶唑上,因为这两个物种的E-检验MIC终点均为拖尾和分散。通过E检验确定的产生β-内酰胺酶的流感嗜血杆菌的氨苄青霉素MIC有时与通过常规检验确定的氨苄青霉素MIC有所不同,这是因为解释E检验抑制椭圆内生长的菌落的多样性。肺炎球菌的E-检验青霉素MIC的稀释度通常比使用补充了溶解的马血的Mueller-Hinton肉汤测定的稀释度低1至2 log2稀释度。然而,通过E-test检测到两种对研究药物具有抗药性的菌株,即0.7%的测试中流感嗜血杆菌有很大的错误,而0.8%的肺炎链球菌有很大的错误。因此,E检验代表了这两种细菌的​​抗菌药敏试验的潜在替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号