...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of cefadroxil and cephalothin disk susceptibility test results.
【24h】

Comparison of cefadroxil and cephalothin disk susceptibility test results.

机译:比较头孢氨苄和头孢菌素药敏试验结果。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Diffusion susceptibility tests with 30-micrograms cefadroxil disks and 30-micrograms cephalothin disks were evaluated. For both agents, the same zone size interpretive criteria were recommended (less than or equal to 14 mm for resistance and greater than or equal to 18 mm for susceptibility). Tests were performed with 904 bacterial isolates, and the data were examined to determine whether the two cephalosporins might be used interchangeably for purposes of in vitro susceptibility testing. When Haemophilus influenzae, Listeria monocytogenes, and methicillin-resistant staphylococci were evaluated, the two agents differed significantly. For testing other species, a cephalothin disk or cephalothin MIC could be used for predicting susceptibility or resistance to cefadroxil.
机译:评估了使用30毫克头孢他罗尔片和30毫克头孢菌素片的扩散敏感性测试。对于这两种药物,建议使用相同的区域大小解释标准(电阻小于或等于14毫米,磁化率大于或等于18毫米)。用904种细菌分离株进行了测试,并检查了数据以确定两种头孢菌素是否可以互换用于体外药敏试验。当评估流感嗜血杆菌,单核细胞增生性李斯特菌和耐甲氧西林的葡萄球菌时,两种药物有显着差异。为了测试其他物种,可以使用头孢菌素片或头孢菌素MIC来预测对头孢羟氨苄的敏感性或耐药性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号