...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of API ZYM system with API AN-Ident, API 20A, Minitek Anaerobe II, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of Clostridium difficile.
【24h】

Comparison of API ZYM system with API AN-Ident, API 20A, Minitek Anaerobe II, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of Clostridium difficile.

机译:API ZYM系统与API AN-Ident,API 20A,Minitek Anaerobe II和RapID-ANA系统的比较,用于鉴定艰难梭菌。

获取原文
           

摘要

The API ZYM system was compared with four anaerobe identification systems for the definitive identification of Clostridium difficile by using 88 cultures of C. difficile grown on Mueller-Hinton blood agar medium. The API ZYM system yielded a distinct and consistent enzyme profile for all test strains, whereas the sensitivities of the other systems in identifying C. difficile ranged from 78 to 96% (AN-Ident, 77.9%; RapID-ANA, 88.6%; Minitek Anaerobe II, 90.9%; and API 20A, 95.5%). The API ZYM system is highly reliable in identifying C. difficile accurately, is rapid, and is relatively simple to use.
机译:通过使用在Mueller-Hinton血琼脂培养基上生长的88个艰难梭菌培养物,将API ZYM系统与四个厌氧菌鉴定系统进行了比较,以确定艰难梭菌。 API ZYM系统对所有测试菌株均产生了独特且一致的酶谱,而其他系统鉴定艰难梭菌的敏感性范围为78%至96%(AN-Ident,77.9%; RapID-ANA,88.6%; Minitek Anaerobe II,90.9%; API 20A,95.5%)。 API ZYM系统在准确识别艰难梭菌方面具有高度可靠性,而且速度很快,并且使用相对简单。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号