...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of methods for serotyping isolates of Haemophilus influenzae.
【24h】

Comparison of methods for serotyping isolates of Haemophilus influenzae.

机译:流感嗜血杆菌分离株血清分型方法的比较。

获取原文
           

摘要

This study compared four methods for serotyping isolates of Haemophilus influenzae. Slide agglutination with commercial antisera (Difco Laboratories and Wellcome Diagnostics), coagglutination (Phadebact Haemophilus Test [Pharmacia Fine Chemicals]), latex agglutination with affinity-purified anticapsular antibody, and counterimmunoelectrophoresis with multiple antisera were used to serotype 80 isolates of H. influenzae. Coagglutination and counterimmunoelectrophoresis correctly identified all 80 isolates as either type b or not type b. Slide agglutination and latex agglutination each successfully identified 76 of the 80 isolates; however, each of these two methods failed to type four isolates because of agglutination of controls. We recommend slide agglutination or coagglutination as the serotyping methods of choice in most laboratories because they are simple, accurate, and rapid. Slide agglutination with Difco antiserum can be performed at the lowest cost.
机译:这项研究比较了四种流感嗜血杆菌分离株血清分型方法。使用商业抗血清(Difco Laboratories and Wellcome Diagnostics)进行载玻片凝集,共凝集(Phadebact Haemophilus Test [Pharmacia Fine Chemicals]),使用亲和纯化的抗荚膜抗体进行乳胶凝集以及使用多种抗血清的抗免疫电泳对80株流感嗜血杆菌分离株进行血清型分析。凝集和反免疫电泳正确地将所有80个分离株鉴定为b型或非b型。玻片凝集法和乳胶凝集法分别成功鉴定出80个分离株中的76个。然而,由于对照的凝集,这两种方法中的每一种都未能分出四个分离株。在大多数实验室中,我们建议使用载玻片凝集或共凝集作为血清分型方法,因为它们简单,准确且快速。用Difco抗血清进行载玻片凝集可以以最低的成本进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号