...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of six typing methods for Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans.
【24h】

Comparison of six typing methods for Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans.

机译:放线放线杆菌的六种打字方法的比较。

获取原文
           

摘要

Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans is an important pathogen in the etiology of severe periodontitis. For epidemiological studies on the prevalence of certain pathogenic clones and transmission of this bacterium, adequate typing methods are necessary. The purpose of this study was to compare six different typing methods for A. actinomycetemcomitans. Five reference strains and 27 fresh clinical isolates from periodontitis patients were used. Serotyping showed 12 serotype a strains, 13 type b strains, 6 type c strains, and 1 nontypeable strain. Biotyping on the basis of the fermentation of mannose, mannitol, and xylose resulted in six biotypes. Antibiogram typing was evaluated by measuring the inhibition zones of seven antibiotics in agar diffusion tests. With this method eight main types which could be further differentiated into 15 subtypes were found. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis patterns of outer membrane proteins were similar among all isolates tested. Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) of whole chromosomal DNA resulted in five main types. These five main types were further differentiated into 24 subtypes on the basis of DNA fragment differences in the high-molecular-weight region. Hybridization of DNA fragments with ribosomal DNA (ribotyping) resulted in 22 to 24 different types, depending on the restriction endonuclease used. Ribotype patterns were easy to interpret and provided an univocal distinction between different strains compared with REA results. When applied to epidemiologically related isolates, all methods were able to discriminate two clonal types among five isolates from five children from one family. We conclude that serotyping, biotyping, and outer membrane patterns were reproducible but had a low discriminatory potential. REA and ribotyping were reproducible and gave the highest number of distinct types. When the DNA typing methodis were compared, all strains tested could be distinguished. These findings confirm the heterogeneity found within the species A. actinomycetemcomitans.
机译:放线杆菌放线杆菌是严重牙周炎病因中的重要病原体。为了对某些致病性克隆的流行和这种细菌的传播进行流行病学研究,必须采用适当的分型方法。这项研究的目的是比较放线放线杆菌的六种不同的打字方法。使用了五种参考菌株和27种来自牙周炎患者的新鲜临床分离株。血清分型显示12个血清型a菌株,13个b型菌株,6个c型菌株和1个不可分型菌株。基于甘露糖,甘露醇和木糖发酵的生物分型产生了六种生物型。通过在琼脂扩散测试中测量七种抗生素的抑制区来评估抗菌素分型。用这种方法发现了八种主要类型,可以进一步分为15个亚型。在所有测试的分离物中,外膜蛋白的十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳图谱相似。全染色体DNA的限制性核酸内切酶分析(REA)产生了五种主要类型。根据高分子量区域的DNA片段差异,将这五种主要类型进一步分为24个亚型。 DNA片段与核糖体DNA的杂交(核糖体分型)导致22至24种不同类型,具体取决于所使用的限制性核酸内切酶。核型模式易于解释,并且与REA结果相比,在不同菌株之间提供了明确的区分。当应用于与流行病学相关的分离株时,所有方法都能够从一个家庭的五个孩子的五个分离株中区分出两种克隆类型。我们得出的结论是,血清分型,生物型和外膜模式是可重现的,但具有较低的歧视潜力。 REA和核糖分型法具有可重复性,且分离类型最多。比较DNA分型方法后,可以区分所有测试菌株。这些发现证实了在放线放线杆菌物种中发现的异质性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号